Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
Chevy454 wrote: How effective is it to cut a one-band dipole for the highest frequency desired and clipping an extension on one leg to get low SWR on lower frequencies? Ken KC2JDY What band? What frequency range? How much space do you have? Numbers are always helpful. I dunno about an asymmetric dipole. I've never seen it done, which makes me suspicious. It should be very easy to model to see what happens. Numbers? If you want bandwidth from an HF dipole, look into a cage or birdcage antenna. It's especially effective at 160 and 75/80 meters. There's no increase in gain over a dipole, but the usable bandwidth is much better. Even better, is a biconical, which is a cage antenna where all the wires come together at the feed point, and are spread into a cone shape at the ends. You can get several decades of usable bandwidth out of a biconical with a fairly constant gain. That's why it's used for EMC/RFI testing: http://www.smeter.net/antennas/wire-cage-dipole.php http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2001/05/03/2/ http://personal.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/D.Jefferies/antennexarticles/cage.html http://jproc.ca/rrp/whitehorse.html (bottom of page) http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&q=cage+dipole http://www.smc-comms.com/cage_dipole.html -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 I use a 4-wire cage inverted vee on 80m. With it cut a bit long (1:1 at around 3650 KHz), it's barely 2:1 at 4000KHz. Spreaders are 1/2" thinwall PVC... 24"x24". I used the handy design program at http://www.smeter.net/. 73, Bryan WA7PRC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PRO-97: Changing the Start Message | Scanner | |||
The Changing Operating Classes | Policy | |||
Changing partners | General | |||
Changing The Tune Of Radio | Broadcasting |