Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Antonio
Vernucci writes since most of the loss in practical coax cables is due to I^2R loss (compared to V^2G) A quick question. If most of the the cable loss is due to I^2R, how can one explain that the foam versions of common coaxial cables show a much lower loss than versions having solid PE insulation? For instance RG-213 is rated at 8.5dB loss for 100 meters at 144 MHz, while RG-213 foam at only 4.5 dB. If G is relatively unimportant with regard to loss, how can one explain that a change of insulation material yields such a tremendous change in loss? Thanks and 73 Tiony I0JX Lower k dielectric larger diameter inner conductor lower resistance lower loss. -- Ian |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|