Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 15, 2:07*pm, (Richard Harrison)
wrote: Art Unwin wrote: "Could you give a similar description only this time make it a 5/8 wavelength antenna." My previous resume` regarded current distribution on a 1/2-wave standing-wave antenna. snip "We know that..........." !!!!!!! hmmmm I don't know who "we" is but for one I don't know Could you explain who "we" is and on what authority or explanation has "we": got for such an implausable statement? I do thank you for responding. Oh what a web we weave when we try.... May be this is why scientists have not yet been able to rationalize radiation and we are just left with theories with holes as in cheese. Industry shows us not just talk about it they show us every day what happens to a particle on their conveyor. They even let you show the particle levitated and revolving. Industry also shows you that eddy currents occur in a closed loop circuit and one must see that the combination of the alternating current flow and the resulting eddy current can levitate a particle. They don't just talk about it they can demonstrate it. This is much more plausable and reproduceable than wireing a house with an open circuit to plug into. Also the old books that you read on both argue that a fractional wavelength is represented by a series circuit that is not open! They also say that a full wave antenna is represented by a parallel or tank circuit and again the circuit is not open! No wonder radiation has not been explained fully when so many paradoxes are present. Oh and if my house is wired as an open circuit asit is time related why on earth would one need fuses and where would they put them if it is an open circuit? The idea of two currents opposing each other on the same surface of an open circuit where the eddy currents is thus cancelled by revolving in opposite directions and the same thing going for the time varying current tells me you have discovered the "big bang" by not placing a fuse in an open circuit. Kraus was not perfect otherwise he would have improved on his thinking during his life time by studying radiation and it's creation. Regards Art We know there`s radiation and loss as the current travels to and fro between the open-circuited ends of the antenna, but if unattenuated is good nough for most purposes for Kraus, it is good enough for me. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|