On Nov 16, 9:23*pm, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:48:39 -0800 (PST), Art Unwin



wrote:
On Nov 16, 8:01*pm, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:18:44 -0800 (PST), Art Unwin

wrote:
So you think I should succumb to those who diss me without foundation
and give then a proper antenna?

Yes, I think you should. *I have yet to see a model, photo, prototype,
description, patent, test results, or other physical manifestation of
your antenna. *I would really like to see an antenna design based on
equilibrium, that ignores skin effect by having current flow in the
middle of a conductor, and that is any way superior to conventional
designs. *I'm quite open to radical new theories and implementations..
Hopefully, it will be built from something more common that
unobtainium.
If a time varying current is flowing thru the center of a conductor
it cannot, I repeat cannot produce either a field from the applied
current
or provide an eddy current.

(...)

I'm really not interested in reading any more assertions, allegations,
accusations, theories, analysis, or repetitions of your previous
postings. *Please re-read what I wrote. *I would like to see a model,
photo, prototype, *description, patent, test results, or other
physical manifestation of your antenna based on equilibrium and/or
whatever you're claiming about conduction through the center of a
conductor. *Show me a *REAL* antenna that works according to your
rather unique principles. *I'm open to proof and demonstration, but
not to furthur allegations and claims.

--
Jeff Liebermann * *
150 Felker St #D * *http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann * * AE6KS * *831-336-2558

Jeff you are not telling the truth again it is becoming a habit of
yours .
Sometime ago you asked me to confide with you some facts about the
antenna as you were of open mind
I then gave you the Gaussian extension information which you could
then compare with Maxwells laws mathematics or alternatively
place it in a Pointings circle. You immediately came back and dissed
the aproach without mathematical evidence so you could join others and
throw stones. I like to keep to the truth especially as I get older.
Apparently you are not afraid to show your true colours when your lies
are detected.
Frankly I can't see me going out of my way to provide a demonstration
thus leaving it to real open minded hams to pursue. Apparently a lot
of hams do not
want to know the truth. As Richard has stated we already have an
antenna so there is no need for another one, seems like he is not
alone in that thinking
when one is not proficient enough to do the math
Art Unwin ...KB9MZ....xg ( UK)