On Nov 10, 6:43*am, Cecil Moore wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
*Neutrons ARE a form of electrons. (leptons)

Art, you seem to be confusing neutrons and
neutrinos. It is unfortunate that their names
are so similar. Electrons and neutrinos are
leptons. Protons and neutrons are baryons.
--
73, Cecil *http://www.w5dxp.com

Thanks,
I will watch out for that in future
Same goes for Lorentz and Coulumb they bvoth have
patriots with very similar lnames.Maybe that is why
some of the odd statements are being made.about
Neutrinos and their respective charges.
I think I should let this thread fade away
Regards
Art

On Nov 10, 7:28*am, Art Unwin wrote:
On Nov 10, 6:43*am, Cecil Moore wrote:

Art Unwin wrote:
*Neutrons ARE a form of electrons. (leptons)

Art, you seem to be confusing neutrons and
neutrinos. It is unfortunate that their names
are so similar. Electrons and neutrinos are
leptons. Protons and neutrons are baryons.
--
73, Cecil *http://www.w5dxp.com

Thanks,
*I will watch out for that in future
Same goes for Lorentz and Coulumb they bvoth have
patriots with very similar lnames.Maybe that is why
some of the odd statements are being made.about
*Neutrinos and their respective charges.
I think I should let this thread fade away
Regards
Art

While I am at it the particle that I refer to may well not be a
neutrinos
but it does seem to fit. Neutrons and all the other chemical particles
that I have negligently brought into the subject
do not have a place in my theory with respect to radiation
just a particle which I feel inclined to call a Neutrinos
I say this for archive purposes so the error that I have been making
in my typing
is cleared for the record
Thanks Cecil
Art
Art

On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 08:25:50 -0800 (PST), Art Unwin
wrote:

While I am at it the particle that I refer to may well not be a
neutrinos

It is not like a neutrino ...but:
but it does seem to fit.

A massless, chargeless particle works for enhancing RF radiation?

Neutrons and all the other chemical particles
that I have negligently brought into the subject
do not have a place in my theory with respect to radiation

That pretty much tosses out the baby with the bathwater.

just a particle which I feel inclined to call a Neutrinos

So, you now claim to have invented/discovered an unknown particle that
you are going to name a Neutrinos? (Convention would probably bristle
at adding just an s makes it respectable science.) Is this a
creationist particle?

Why not call it an Artrino or Unwintron? How did you discover it?
What did you use as a detector? Were you listening to 160M when it
came on with a signature tune like Big Ben and the BBC?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC