Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
wrote: Art Unwin wrote: Pull yourself together. Apparently easier said then done. Neutrons ARE a form of electrons. (leptons) snip crap neutron: classification baryon, electric charge 0 neutrino: elementary particle, electric charge 0 electron: elementary particle, electric charge 1.6 X 10-19 C proton: classification baryon, electric charge 1.6 X 10-19 C I wonder if Art meant to say "Neutrinos ARE a form of electrons. (leptons)". That would be closer to the truth than what was actually quoted above, in that electrons and neutrinos are both leptons. It's still incorrect, though, according to the definitions I've read. Although neutrinos and electrons are both leptons, that doesn't mean that "neutrinos are a form of electrons". By analogy: dogs and cats are both mammals. That doesn't mean that dogs are a type of cat, or that cats are a type of dog. For what it's worth - I have seen no evidence at all to indicate that flows of neutrinos have anything whatsoever to do with the behavior of antennas or with the transfer of electromagnetic energy from/to antennas and/or free space. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |