Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
rec.radio.amateur.homebrew,alt.internet.wireless added back to the
distribution line. On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:03:32 -0800, John Smith wrote: Jeff Liebermann wrote: If stealing internet service from the neighbors is your intended purpose, you selected the wrong type of antenna. ... I'd say stealing is bit strong, I run an open wireless access point here, its' SSID is "WelcomeAboard!" My home system is "1540 Jackson Ave" which is my address. The assumption is that someone wanting to use my system can bang on the door and ask permission. My office SSID uses the company name. I think that "wrong type" (referring to OMNI, apparently) of antenna is perfect, given there are a few access points within range. I'll stand by my statement. Unless you're running a mesh network, an omni at the client end is a bad idea. The client knows the direction of the desired access point and should use a directional antenna to minimize interference. In my limited experience (I ran a small WISP and neighborhood LAN/WLAN for a few years) interference is the most serious impediment to reliable operation. The more you can do to NOT hear the undesired stations, the more reliable the connection. You can "bridge" multiple access points for better throughput ... Sorta. You can do route switching easily enough, but load balancing between multiple internet connections can't be done without IP bonding, which requires everyone's cooperation (including the ISP's). The problem is that you can't use multiple ISP's to improve the download speed from a single connection. For example, if you want to download a large file, it will only go as fast as the speed of the fastest ISP connection. The other WAN interfaces remain comatose because there's no way to bond the single destination IP to two different download streams and routes. You can download something else using the 2nd WAN interface, but you can't use it to increase the speed of the first. Uploading has a similar limitation, where you can't improve the speed to a single connection. Where such routers work best is if there is a LAN full of users sharing multiple WAN connections, not for a single user looking for "better throughput..." I've used a few of these with moderate success: http://www.edimax.com/en/produce_list.php?pl1_id=3&pl2_id= (See load balancing and multi-homing routers near bottom of page). Incidentally, multiple cient radios, run to a passive combiner in a single omni antenna is a total loser. The FCC specifically proscribes synchronizing wi-fi radios. Even if the isolation can be increased sufficiently to prevent receiver overload, it's highly probable that a receive packet will arrive exactly when some other client radio goes into transmit. Some relief can be obtained by using different non-overlapping channels (1, 6, 11), but only with expensive bandpass cavity filters. The spread spectrum spreads quite nicely into the spectrum of the adjacent radio. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
supply GPS+GSM+WIFI car antenna, GPS+GSM shark fin car antenna | Shortwave | |||
supply GPS+GSM+WIFI car antenna, GPS+GSM shark fin car antenna | Antenna | |||
Help with Wifi antenna | Antenna | |||
scanner antenna for WiFi? | Scanner |