Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Nov 28, 12:51*pm, Richard Clark where the question remains at: where did you get ...72 mV/m from? It is evident your field quote is NOT from this specific Mininec r-f ground model of yours above. Can you not view the screen clip at the link I posted showing this? Why do you keep asking? All of the windows shown in my screen clip resulted from the NEC model data appearing in the upper left window of that clip, and all windows in the clip appeared on the screen at same time and were driven by that data. Note the selection of a Real/MININEC ground in the EZNEC window in the upper left corner, and the further selection of a "medium ground" on the line below. One of the other windows there shows the "near-field" value of 72 mV/m at 1 km for 1 kW of radiated power for this model. Are you comprehending all that is shown in that clip? More interesting would be his enquiry or explanation into how you defeated the lock-out for a feature that is a poor method for near field analysis. No defeat of such was necessary. EZNEC produced the data results for my model exactly as shown in my screen clip, with no complaints or subterfuge on my part. RF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Elevation Patterns of Ground Mounted Vertical Monopoles | Antenna | |||
FS: Hy-Gain AV-640 Vertical (Mint) | Swap | |||
Vertical ant gain vs No radials | Antenna | |||
FS: Hy-Gain AV-640 Vertical (Mint) | Swap | |||
1/4 wave vertical vs. loaded vertical | Antenna |