| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:20:33 -0800 (PST), Richard Fry
wrote: But looking at a NEC far-field analysis this would seem impossible, due to the greatly reduced fields in this sector that NEC shows for a vertical monopole over real earth. NEC is not a propagation modeler. However, resourcing the top engineers of the AM field for their observations of sky-wave and ground-wave field strengths (a typical service application) where they combine destructively (the "fading wall"); at a distance of 70 miles, for 50% of the time, both signals are equal (with propagation variations of phase accounting for fading). The graph you supply suggests that this 70 mile distance is obtained by a launch angle (for the sky-wave) of 60 degrees. The NEC far-field analysis for the BL&E antenna of 70 foot tall radiator in a field of 113 135 foot radials over average ground has a response of -2.32dB @ 60° and -1.61dB @ 1° which shows a pretty close accord with field reports from Laport (Fig 2.7). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Elevation Patterns of Ground Mounted Vertical Monopoles | Antenna | |||
| FS: Hy-Gain AV-640 Vertical (Mint) | Swap | |||
| Vertical ant gain vs No radials | Antenna | |||
| FS: Hy-Gain AV-640 Vertical (Mint) | Swap | |||
| 1/4 wave vertical vs. loaded vertical | Antenna | |||