JB wrote:

...
Obama has been saying "let them eat cake" for a long
time. I wonder if anyone caught his Dec 2 governors
meeting on the economy where he tells them "...change
is going to come from YOU, not from Washington". I was
hoping he would at least be willing to learn but the voters
have a lot to learn for sure.


Actually, your brain has turned to jelly from lack of use ... :-(

Everything comes from you and me, it a government of the people, by the
people and for the people ...

Now, let's get to work, give 'em the bums rush, and get rid of this
group of crooks! If Obama assists, good enough, if not, let him begone
also.

Regards,
JS

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
JB wrote:

...
Obama has been saying "let them eat cake" for a long
time. I wonder if anyone caught his Dec 2 governors
meeting on the economy where he tells them "...change
is going to come from YOU, not from Washington". I was
hoping he would at least be willing to learn but the voters
have a lot to learn for sure.


Actually, your brain has turned to jelly from lack of use ... :-(

Everything comes from you and me, it a government of the people, by the
people and for the people ...

Now, let's get to work, give 'em the bums rush, and get rid of this
group of crooks! If Obama assists, good enough, if not, let him begone
also.

Regards,
JS

Typical red herring argument. When you don't have a answer, then proceed to
insults and character assassination. Gee, wasn't Obama from Al Capones neck
of the woods? I mean how do you beat up people for votes if you don't have
their unions and livelihood in the palm of your hand. Oh! that's right,
Obama's not a crook, he's a LAWYER! His favorite idol is Saul Alinsky (who
seems to be the hero of the party since so many quote him) who actually
worked for Al Capone! Then there's his "spiritual advisor" that he had to
distance himself after 20 years of EXPLOITATION of race and class
divisions.

Republicans keep harping about conservative "values" like personal
responsibility and not killing babies for the sake of convenience.
Democrats think of the little people as votes and "manure for the
revolution" and that its stupid to go down with your team when you can just
"throw someone under the bus" (the vernacular of ACORN).

The only difference I see is one that is shamed into following their own
rules and another who simply changes the rules or the judges.

see: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...3185000AAwKH7l

JB wrote:
....

Like I say it is a no-brainer, the forefathers gave us a heavy
responsibility:

Declaration of Independence
[Adopted in Congress 4 July 1776]
The Unanimous Declaration of the Thirteen United States of America

When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people
to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another,
and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal
station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a
decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should
declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
....

As true Americans, we are ordered to take back and restore a sane and
just government when our public servants forget their places ... end of
story.

Regards,
JS

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
JB wrote:
...

Like I say it is a no-brainer, the forefathers gave us a heavy
responsibility:

Declaration of Independence
[Adopted in Congress 4 July 1776]
The Unanimous Declaration of the Thirteen United States of America

When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people
to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another,
and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal
station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a
decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should
declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
...

As true Americans, we are ordered to take back and restore a sane and
just government when our public servants forget their places ... end of
story.

Regards,
JS

Like I say, the voters have a lot to learn. They have to be more discerning
than a child in the cereal aisle.

JB wrote:

...
Like I say, the voters have a lot to learn. They have to be more discerning
than a child in the cereal aisle.


You think that's the problem, really?

There are many individuals I would like to see as my representatives,
even president. Do you think I will ever see them as contenders?

I think the same owners of McCain also own Obama, or shortly will ... :-(

However, this does have my attention:

http://change.gov/

But, yanno, I am suspicious? I am just that way, yanno?

Regards,
JS

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
JB wrote:

...
Like I say, the voters have a lot to learn. They have to be more
discerning
than a child in the cereal aisle.


You think that's the problem, really?

There are many individuals I would like to see as my representatives,
even president. Do you think I will ever see them as contenders?

I think the same owners of McCain also own Obama, or shortly will ... :-(

However, this does have my attention:

http://change.gov/

But, yanno, I am suspicious? I am just that way, yanno?

Regards,
JS

It's a cinch we can't trust the regular media to properly cover this
administration because they even overtly promoted it, while at the same time
slamming the current administration over the war. The inability of the
previous administration to deal with it and the terrorist acts that were a
product seem to have been lost in the shuffle. Here the guy who was in the
middle of it tries to come clean:
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200401/pollack

Then there's the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac impending disaster that was covered
up over and over until it finally came home to roost and has goofed up the
world economy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hN31-...eature=related

And now they are there to clean it all up? Give me a break. Be very afraid
when people are promoted for bad behavior and bad judgment.

JB wrote:

...
It's a cinch we can't trust the regular media to properly cover this
administration because they even overtly promoted it, while at the same time
slamming the current administration over the war. The inability of the
previous administration to deal with it and the terrorist acts that were a
product seem to have been lost in the shuffle. Here the guy who was in the
middle of it tries to come clean:
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200401/pollack

Then there's the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac impending disaster that was covered
up over and over until it finally came home to roost and has goofed up the
world economy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hN31-...eature=related

And now they are there to clean it all up? Give me a break. Be very afraid
when people are promoted for bad behavior and bad judgment.


I must differ. I think their reporting documented true failings of bush
and govt.

I also believe, their reporting depicted the true hope the "down
trodden" wish to place in Obama ... they are just sorely tired of being
sick and tired ...

Regards,
JS

PLease, God. Let this thread die!

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
JB wrote:

...
Obama has been saying "let them eat cake" for a long
time. I wonder if anyone caught his Dec 2 governors
meeting on the economy where he tells them "...change
is going to come from YOU, not from Washington". I was
hoping he would at least be willing to learn but the voters
have a lot to learn for sure.


This profile makes more sense. The only problem with the definition
involves the local culture standards clause. In this sense, Hitler and Idi
Amin would have been OK! In my book, Moral Relativism is dung.
http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html

JB wrote:
"John Smith" wrote in message
...
JB wrote:

...
Obama has been saying "let them eat cake" for a long
time. I wonder if anyone caught his Dec 2 governors
meeting on the economy where he tells them "...change
is going to come from YOU, not from Washington". I was
hoping he would at least be willing to learn but the voters
have a lot to learn for sure.


This profile makes more sense. The only problem with the definition
involves the local culture standards clause. In this sense, Hitler and Idi
Amin would have been OK! In my book, Moral Relativism is dung.
http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html


Makes perfect sense to me. Government is supposed to be the people,
that is where the change MUST come from. You think those in power which
have usurped the peoples powers are the norm for True Americans? I
think not ...

Ask not what your government can do for you; Ask what you can do to
restore power to the people!

Regards,
JS