| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Dec 9, 3:08 am, Richard Clark wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 22:00:02 -0800 (PST), Ginu wrote: Unless you can provide me with more than just random conclusions, I may be able to get to the bottom of this. Otherwise, your posts have been much less than helpful. If multipath and interference fall into the category of random conclusions.... You were wrapped around that axle more than two years ago. The search term of Zigbee and Ginu (enlarged to include your alias of Omar Fink) fairly draws a portrait of someone wandering through a fog of 3000 threads and postings. I can see why this has mystified you for five solid months - you are out of your element. You've been given every extrapolatable answer from across several dozen outlets. As I suspected earlier, the simplest answer is that Zigbee isn't designed to do what you expect of it. Roaming the planet asking the same question is unlikely to provide any different outcome. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Posting in several forums where there may be experts reading at different times and different forums is not a stretch. Physical layer questions are out of my realm and, unfortunately, I have to model them in my simulations. You're trolling in my threads and, for some odd reason, appear to feel the need to belittle my work. If you can't add anything constructive, please don't waste my time. I would appreciate it if you refrained from posting in my threads in the future. Thank you. Honestly, if I needed a babysitter I would have asked for one. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:26:43 -0800 (PST), Ginu
wrote: You're trolling in my threads and, for some odd reason, appear to feel the need to belittle my work. If you can't add anything constructive, please don't waste my time. I would appreciate it if you refrained from posting in my threads in the future. Thank you. Such a tender ego, and pride of ownership is the first clue to its easy bruising. As for trolling, your contributions have that distinct "under the bridge" flavor. Put a notch on your keyboard and move to the next group. Talk about wasting time. Omar, it takes very little effort to review your trail to see you have one foot nailed to the floor and the other on a skate. You haven't altered your question much in 5 months (with every appearance of not having progressed one jot), offered your heart felt thanks to all those who "helped" you, giving you pretty much the same leads you said you would follow up on.... And we find you at the next street corner with your hat out for more spare change. Hard to imagine how with so many similar responses that you haven't gotten it yet, and more amazing you might think that the problem is not in the question. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Dec 9, 6:05 pm, Richard Clark wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:26:43 -0800 (PST), Ginu wrote: You're trolling in my threads and, for some odd reason, appear to feel the need to belittle my work. If you can't add anything constructive, please don't waste my time. I would appreciate it if you refrained from posting in my threads in the future. Thank you. Such a tender ego, and pride of ownership is the first clue to its easy bruising. As for trolling, your contributions have that distinct "under the bridge" flavor. Put a notch on your keyboard and move to the next group. Talk about wasting time. Omar, it takes very little effort to review your trail to see you have one foot nailed to the floor and the other on a skate. You haven't altered your question much in 5 months (with every appearance of not having progressed one jot), offered your heart felt thanks to all those who "helped" you, giving you pretty much the same leads you said you would follow up on.... And we find you at the next street corner with your hat out for more spare change. Hard to imagine how with so many similar responses that you haven't gotten it yet, and more amazing you might think that the problem is not in the question. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Richard, again, you are adding nothing to the discussion. Please refrain from posting in my threads from now on. Those in this thread have given me significant information that may lead to the solution. Something that I have not gotten previously. Thanks again and goodbye. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:40:47 -0800 (PST), Ginu
wrote: Those in this thread have given me significant information that may lead to the solution. You must have littered more than several dozen newsgroups with that same proclamation - can you succinctly point out how any single significant information advances your solution? That, too, is missing from your identical box-car series of postings that tend to repeat themselves for weeks into months. What a troll. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Field strength / power / path loss calculator | Antenna | |||
| UHF penetration & path loss Q: | Antenna | |||
| Scanner sensitivity and path loss? | Antenna | |||
| Scanner sensitivity and path loss? | Antenna | |||
| Antenna Confusion | Shortwave | |||