Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Towers - lattice vs. tubular?
I'm starting to look for a 55' freestanding tower with house wall
bracket. Am undecided on a lattice type or tubular. Being an old geezer I am not interested in the standard lattice type which requires climbing, but a nestable type to be raised and lowered by a crank or motor. I figure if it can be lowered I could work on it from the roof of my one story house. Main antenna would be a Cushcraft A4S 4-element or equivalent - wind area abt 4 sq ft. Not sure I could handle the huge X7 Big Thunder and its 7.9 sq ft., although that would be ideal. Any first hand experience or recommendations? Marv W5MTV |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Use of lattice line to feed dipole | Antenna | |||
Lattice-wound RF choke replacement, 50 years later | Boatanchors | |||
Lattice-wound RF choke replacement, 50 years later | Homebrew | |||
Lattice-wound RF choke replacement, 50 years later | Homebrew | |||
Is Universal Towers (auminum towers) Still in Business ? | Antenna |