| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fred PA0FVH wrote:
Dear group, As a temporarily solution I would like to use a cheap 5/8, 6/8 or 7/8 WL commercially available CB antenna as a non resonant vertical with elevated radials for use on 10 - 40 meters tuned by an automatic remote ATU at the base of the antenna. I used MMANA and EZNEC (demo) to calculate the expected impedance for the frequency range and found too many results for the height of the antenna. Now I am confused about what to select. Is 5/8WL on 10meters a good height or 8 meter (22')? What I want is a low take off angle on 20 and 30 meters with high efficiency and an impedance which my remote ATU can handle. Fred, PA0FVH To a first order, you just want to avoid lengths where it's close to a half wavelength (assuming you're using an ATU that's designed for this sort of application) because that's where the Z is highest and toughest to match. The low Z points are going to be easy (a few tens of ohms, and almost any tuner can do that). So, the lowest frequency where this is the case is where the wavelength is 16m... straddling the 15 and 17m bands. In practice, what you might need to do is adjust the length of the antenna by a few tens of cm one way or the other to find a place where your tuner is happy. Another situation is where the antenna is a full wavelength.. but 8m is higher than the 10m ham band, so you're probably ok. The other problem is if the reactive component gets too far for your tuner to handle, but without knowing the tuning range of your tuner, that's hard to know. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Got my vertical resonant on 160 | Shortwave | |||
| The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
| Resonant and Non-resonant Radials | Antenna | |||
| AH-4 vs. AT-180 w/resonant antenna | Antenna | |||
| RESONANT ANTENNAS | Antenna | |||