Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 10th 08, 07:01 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 199
Default 10m - 40m non resonant vertical

FWIW, http://dixienc.us/28FtVert/28FtVertical.htm
might help you make some decisions.

Unless you already have the materials I suggest you build with ten
foot lengths of chain link top rail. The last time I priced it at the
home improvement store it was $11 per section.

If it were not for the price of the tuner it would be a cheap antenna.

Every time I tinker with it I learn a little more.

If DX is your thing, go for the low angle radiation for your favored
band. DX is of little interest to me so the high angle radiation on
some bands just gives me a different set of Hams to work.

John Ferrell W8CCW

On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 23:11:10 +0100, "Fred PA0FVH"
wrote:

Dear group,

As a temporarily solution I would like to use a cheap 5/8, 6/8 or 7/8 WL
commercially available CB antenna as a non resonant vertical with elevated
radials for use on 10 - 40 meters tuned by an automatic remote ATU at the
base of the antenna. I used MMANA and EZNEC (demo) to calculate the expected
impedance for the frequency range and found too many results for the height
of the antenna. Now I am confused about what to select.
Is 5/8WL on 10meters a good height or 8 meter (22')?
What I want is a low take off angle on 20 and 30 meters with high efficiency
and an impedance which my remote ATU can handle.

Fred, PA0FVH




  #2   Report Post  
Old December 10th 08, 07:29 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,915
Default 10m - 40m non resonant vertical

John Ferrell wrote:
FWIW, http://dixienc.us/28FtVert/28FtVertical.htm
might help you make some decisions.

Unless you already have the materials I suggest you build with ten
foot lengths of chain link top rail. The last time I priced it at the
home improvement store it was $11 per section.

If it were not for the price of the tuner it would be a cheap antenna.

Every time I tinker with it I learn a little more.

If DX is your thing, go for the low angle radiation for your favored
band. DX is of little interest to me so the high angle radiation on
some bands just gives me a different set of Hams to work.

John Ferrell W8CCW


Hmmm, in "Kalifornia" (we tend towards actors to play the part of
governors, here) "high angle" seems to give me the east coast; While,
low angle tends to give me the Aussies ... DX isn't the east coast?

Regards,
JS
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Got my vertical resonant on 160 Dave[_18_] Shortwave 3 September 6th 08 12:52 AM
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] RHF Shortwave 0 December 27th 05 06:03 PM
Resonant and Non-resonant Radials Reg Edwards Antenna 1 January 8th 05 10:27 PM
AH-4 vs. AT-180 w/resonant antenna Drink Antenna 2 August 25th 03 01:38 AM
RESONANT ANTENNAS JDer8745 Antenna 39 July 30th 03 06:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017