LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14   Report Post  
Old December 23rd 08, 05:40 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default NEC Evaluations

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 04:20:26 -0800 (PST), Richard Fry
wrote:

A table
on Page 3 there shows a measurement uncertainty at the NIST test
facilities of ±1/4 to ±1 dB, depending on the DUT and the frequency
range.


Actually, ±1 dB would be the most likely error for instrumentation
error (±¼ dB could never be achieved); matching error would compound
that; the antenna would add another ±1 dB; path would scramble that
further if not performed in an anechoic chamber or on a calibrated
range.

Mac's test system (from fig. 15 he reports in other correspondence)
would accumulate up to the several dB he reported earlier. It would
exhibit a very good relative accuracy, but absolute accuracy would be
several dB error as he has already offered in prior correspondence.
Path problems would have to be hammered out on their own.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017