LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old December 28th 08, 09:35 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,915
Default Antenna for shortwave reception

RHF wrote:

...
Yeah - Once it is 'placed' in the "System" the MatchBox
becomes part of the "System" and becomes one of the
loses within the "System"
...


Actually, the ONLY reason to use a matchbox is that the antenna is less
than optimal for the freq(s) in question, end-of-story. However,
multi-band operation and simply having to cover a wide swath of
frequencies makes this the logical way to go, a matchbox ... in an ideal
situation, a matchbox would be avoided.


Now -if- That is True : Then Why Us The MatchBox
within an RF Energy Radiating System ?


There is nothing magical about a transmitting antenna, like I stated
earlier, the exact same physics govern that antenna in receive or xmit
modes. The matchbox allows you to achieve "maximum POOR performance"
from the POOR antenna ...

...
So you are say that a MatchBox will not improve
the ERP of an RF Energy Radiating System ?
And that the Receiving Station will not hear you
'better' when the MatchBox is properly used with
the RF Energy Radiating System ?
...


I said NO such thing, indeed, I stated the EXACT opposite, it allows
maximum power transfer to the antenna, however, the losses in the POOR
antenna are now increased due to the losses in the matchbox--as heat.
And, no problems which exist in the POOR antenna have been rectified,
they are just masked ...

...
Electrical Characteristics = 'apparent electrical length'
...


As I stated before, physical length need not be related to electrical
length, however, in the most efficient design possible, they WILL be ...
and that is only considering maximum transfer of power to the antenna,
not, necessarily, the ether--and, that is NOT necessarily related to a
desirable pattern of radiation of that power from the POOR antenna--the
patten, IMHO, is governed, mainly, by antenna length and shape, however,
some designs actually can cheat this, at least a bit.

- And, this is all-in-a-nut shell;

- as you realize, a proper education
- in this field is NOT a trivial thing.
...


being an old timer myself - i still find simply listening
to the radio to be enjoyable ~ RHF
.
.


As I stated before, a complete explanation/understanding of all factors
involved defies a simple explanation ... as, if that were possible, no
one would spend years in college, they could attend a week or a month
and come away an expert.

And, my field is computer science, this is all just a hobby with me.
The little knowledge which I have assembled has been done over the
course of years, even decades. I am hear to find out just "how deep
this rabbit hole goes ..."

Regards,
JS


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poor to no shortwave Reception David Mills Shortwave 2 December 18th 07 05:54 PM
Should a shortwave loop antenna, hung outside, also improve FM reception? dead of night Shortwave 0 January 23rd 07 12:05 AM
The "Green" Antenna for AM/MW Radio Reception plus Shortwave Too ! RHF Shortwave 0 January 10th 07 01:21 PM
Sangean ATS-505 Receiver - Improving your Shortwave Radio Reception with an External Shortwave Listener's (SWL) Antenna RHF Shortwave 0 January 16th 06 09:12 PM
shortwave reception.. with Grundig YB 400 PE David Mills Shortwave 4 May 18th 04 06:58 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017