Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RHF wrote:
... Yeah - Once it is 'placed' in the "System" the MatchBox becomes part of the "System" and becomes one of the loses within the "System" ... Actually, the ONLY reason to use a matchbox is that the antenna is less than optimal for the freq(s) in question, end-of-story. However, multi-band operation and simply having to cover a wide swath of frequencies makes this the logical way to go, a matchbox ... in an ideal situation, a matchbox would be avoided. Now -if- That is True : Then Why Us The MatchBox within an RF Energy Radiating System ? There is nothing magical about a transmitting antenna, like I stated earlier, the exact same physics govern that antenna in receive or xmit modes. The matchbox allows you to achieve "maximum POOR performance" from the POOR antenna ... ... So you are say that a MatchBox will not improve the ERP of an RF Energy Radiating System ? And that the Receiving Station will not hear you 'better' when the MatchBox is properly used with the RF Energy Radiating System ? ... I said NO such thing, indeed, I stated the EXACT opposite, it allows maximum power transfer to the antenna, however, the losses in the POOR antenna are now increased due to the losses in the matchbox--as heat. And, no problems which exist in the POOR antenna have been rectified, they are just masked ... ... Electrical Characteristics = 'apparent electrical length' ... As I stated before, physical length need not be related to electrical length, however, in the most efficient design possible, they WILL be ... and that is only considering maximum transfer of power to the antenna, not, necessarily, the ether--and, that is NOT necessarily related to a desirable pattern of radiation of that power from the POOR antenna--the patten, IMHO, is governed, mainly, by antenna length and shape, however, some designs actually can cheat this, at least a bit. - And, this is all-in-a-nut shell; - as you realize, a proper education - in this field is NOT a trivial thing. ... being an old timer myself - i still find simply listening to the radio to be enjoyable ~ RHF . . As I stated before, a complete explanation/understanding of all factors involved defies a simple explanation ... as, if that were possible, no one would spend years in college, they could attend a week or a month and come away an expert. And, my field is computer science, this is all just a hobby with me. The little knowledge which I have assembled has been done over the course of years, even decades. I am hear to find out just "how deep this rabbit hole goes ..." Regards, JS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Poor to no shortwave Reception | Shortwave | |||
Should a shortwave loop antenna, hung outside, also improve FM reception? | Shortwave | |||
The "Green" Antenna for AM/MW Radio Reception plus Shortwave Too ! | Shortwave | |||
Sangean ATS-505 Receiver - Improving your Shortwave Radio Reception with an External Shortwave Listener's (SWL) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
shortwave reception.. with Grundig YB 400 PE | Shortwave |