RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   cantenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/139811-cantenna.html)

RF BURNS January 2nd 09 09:36 PM

cantenna
 

"KC8QJP" wrote in message
. ..
a crisco can works well

http://www.radiobanter.com/showpost....73&postcount=1



Dave January 2nd 09 09:40 PM

cantenna
 

"RF BURNS" wrote in message
...

"KC8QJP" wrote in message
. ..
a crisco can works well

http://www.radiobanter.com/showpost....73&postcount=1


leave the crisco in it and after tuning up you can fry your dinner!



Gerald Simonowits January 2nd 09 10:05 PM

cantenna
 
In article IDh7l.451354$TT4.408322@attbi_s22, Erich
wrote:

Jim-NN7K wrote:
funkbastler wrote:
On Thu, 01 Jan 2009 17:41:27 +0000, Dave wrote:

KC8QJP wrote:
a crisco can works well

http://www.mfjenterprises.com/Produc...uctid=MFJ-250X

Where's a good place to find transformer oil (besides at the top
of the utility pole outside the house)? Or, what's an acceptable
substitute?



Mineral Oil (available at your local drug store).


Just be prepared for some strange looks when you purchase a gallon of
mineral oil all at once. :-O


yup, that's what I used when I got my ticket many years ago to fill up
my cantenna. Still have it in the closet but haven't used it in years!

Kenneth P. Stox January 2nd 09 10:16 PM

cantenna
 
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Barry L. Ornitz, PhD WA4VZQ wrote:

Silicone oils are excellent from a health standpoint...


John Smith wrote:

However, the last silicone oil I purchased was at an auction... and
food grade to boot!)



I am a bit puzzled. IIRC, the silicone in women's breast implants
would/could/did leak and cause fairly serious health problems. Yet, Dr.
Ornitz says "Silicone oils are excellent from a health standpoint" and
Mr. Smith says: "food grade".

Could anyone take a shot at explaining this apparent dichotomy?

Inquiring minds want to know.


There are plenty of things that are inert when passing through the gut
that will be lethal if introduced directly into the body.

Allodoxaphobia January 2nd 09 11:42 PM

cantenna
 
On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:36:17 -0500, Billy Burpelson wrote:

I am a bit puzzled. IIRC, the silicone in women's breast implants
would/could/did leak and cause fairly serious health problems. Yet, Dr.
Ornitz says "Silicone oils are excellent from a health standpoint" and
Mr. Smith says: "food grade".

Could anyone take a shot at explaining this apparent dichotomy?


Plaintiffs' lawyers and defendants' lawyers....

John Smith January 2nd 09 11:44 PM

cantenna
 
Billy Burpelson wrote:

...
I am a bit puzzled. IIRC, the silicone in women's breast implants
would/could/did leak and cause fairly serious health problems. Yet, Dr.
Ornitz says "Silicone oils are excellent from a health standpoint" and
Mr. Smith says: "food grade".

Could anyone take a shot at explaining this apparent dichotomy?

Inquiring minds want to know.


A friend of mine, in the medical profession, once told me there is only
3 things she knew of which the body would "tolerate" as implant
materials: teflon/nylon, glass, and some grades of stainless steel ...

I don't know, but seems like diamond would be ok, doesn't it? Others
substances? Perhaps she was only speaking of the materials she has
seen, next time I see her, I will ask ... you have me curious now.

Regards,
JS

Billy Burpelson[_2_] January 3rd 09 01:12 AM

cantenna
 

Billy Burpelson wrote:

Barry L. Ornitz, PhD WA4VZQ wrote:

Silicone oils are excellent from a health standpoint...


John Smith wrote:

However, the last silicone oil I purchased was at an auction... and
food grade to boot!)



I am a bit puzzled. IIRC, the silicone in women's breast implants
would/could/did leak and cause fairly serious health problems. Yet,
Dr. Ornitz says "Silicone oils are excellent from a health standpoint"
and Mr. Smith says: "food grade".

Could anyone take a shot at explaining this apparent dichotomy?

Inquiring minds want to know.


Kenneth P. Stox wrote:

There are plenty of things that are inert when passing through the gut
that will be lethal if introduced directly into the body.


And swallowing something is -not- being "introduced directly into the
body"? I would have thought otherwise...

Billy Burpelson[_2_] January 3rd 09 01:14 AM

cantenna
 

"RF BURNS" wrote in message
...
"KC8QJP" wrote in message
. ..
a crisco can works well

http://www.radiobanter.com/showpost....73&postcount=1


Dave wrote:

leave the crisco in it and after tuning up you can fry your dinner!


....and fry your arteries with all the cholesterol!

John Smith January 3rd 09 01:30 AM

cantenna
 
Billy Burpelson wrote:

...
And swallowing something is -not- being "introduced directly into the
body"? I would have thought otherwise...


I mean, "Come on!" You have to ask that?

A hypodermic needles injection is "directly." A swallowed substance is
directly introduced into the digestive tract, where it is the
assimilated into the blood ...

Another example? A bullet from a gun is "directly" introduced into the
body, a swallowed bullet is not ...

Regards,
JS

RHF January 3rd 09 03:41 AM

cantenna
 
On Jan 2, 2:16*pm, "Kenneth P. Stox" wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Barry L. Ornitz, PhD * WA4VZQ wrote:


Silicone oils are excellent from a health standpoint...


John Smith wrote:


However, the last silicone oil I purchased was at an auction... and
food grade to boot!)


I am a bit puzzled. IIRC, the silicone in women's breast implants
would/could/did leak and cause fairly serious health problems. Yet, Dr.
Ornitz says "Silicone oils are excellent from a health standpoint" and
Mr. Smith says: "food grade".


Could anyone take a shot at explaining this apparent dichotomy?


Inquiring minds want to know.


- There are plenty of things that are inert when
- passing through the gut that will be lethal if
- introduced directly into the body.

Yeah - You can Sallow a FMJ Bullet
and 'pass-it' quite nicely.

-fwiw- a Solid Lead Bullet might produce
different results in the 'gut'.

But that same FMJ Bullet 'passing-thru'
the Body could be very Lethal.

Bryan January 3rd 09 05:31 AM

cantenna
 
Bob Campbell wrote:
John Smith wrote:
Dave wrote:

...
http://www.eham.net/forums/Elmers/1574


Uh, yeah, I guess your reference to a dummy load is helpful, in some
other reality ...


I was just happy to see someone in that thread pop up with the warning
about PCBs in old transformer oil. I couldn't believe someone said they
actually got power company transformer oil!

After I refurbished my Cantenna (needed a new globar resistor and cleaning),
I was able to get a gallon from my local power company (free gratis). It
took a few phone calls to find the supervisor of the transformer shop. At
the rate their pump runs, the trick was getting /only/ one gallon!

I considered mineral oil but learned transformer oil has better thermal
characteristics. I now have a homebrew air-cooled dummy load that will
handle over a kilowatt continuously.

Bryan WA7PRC



JIMMIE January 3rd 09 10:44 AM

cantenna
 
On Jan 3, 12:31*am, "Bryan" wrote:
Bob Campbell wrote:
John Smith wrote:
Dave wrote:


...
http://www.eham.net/forums/Elmers/1574


Uh, yeah, I guess your reference to a dummy load is helpful, in some
other reality ...


I was just happy to see someone in that thread pop up with the warning
about PCBs in old transformer oil. * I couldn't believe someone said they
actually got power company transformer oil!


After I refurbished my Cantenna (needed a new globar resistor and cleaning),
I was able to get a gallon from my local power company (free gratis). *It
took a few phone calls to find the supervisor of the transformer shop. *At
the rate their pump runs, the trick was getting /only/ one gallon!

I considered mineral oil but learned transformer oil has better thermal
characteristics. *I now have a homebrew air-cooled dummy load that will
handle over a kilowatt continuously.

Bryan WA7PRC


I used Shell Diala for years in radar systems. The last time I changed
the oil we used somrthing else, probably cheaper. The main ingredient
in all odf it is mineral oil but it has a few additives. Local PoCO
uses the same. We got some from them one time and they had a RR tank
car full of it.

Jimmie

Billy Burpelson[_2_] January 3rd 09 03:38 PM

cantenna
 

Billy Burpelson wrote:

...
And swallowing something is -not- being "introduced directly into the
body"? I would have thought otherwise...


John Smith wrote:

I mean, "Come on!" You have to ask that?

A hypodermic needles injection is "directly." A swallowed substance is
directly introduced into the digestive tract, where it is the
assimilated into the blood ...


Huh? Are we both saying the same thing?

If a substance is injected by a hypodermic needle and then 'assimilated
into the blood', how is that different from you saying "A swallowed
substance is directly introduced into the digestive tract, where it is
the[n] assimilated into the blood ..."?

Seems like it gets into the blood stream (and is thus circulated around
the entire body) in -either- case. So your point is...?

Back to my original, bottom line question: is silicone in the blood
stream good for you or bad for you? (and yes, I DO have to ask, because
your response seems to make no sense).

Regards,
Billy

Mike Coslo[_2_] January 3rd 09 05:39 PM

cantenna
 
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Back to my original, bottom line question: is silicone in the blood
stream good for you or bad for you? (and yes, I DO have to ask, because
your response seems to make no sense).


Yes. Ask the women whose breast implants broke.

- 73 de Mike N3LI -

[email protected] January 3rd 09 06:01 PM

cantenna
 
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Mike Coslo wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Back to my original, bottom line question: is silicone in the blood
stream good for you or bad for you? (and yes, I DO have to ask, because
your response seems to make no sense).


Yes. Ask the women whose breast implants broke.


Or you could ask the Mayo Clinic which says the only problem is the
formation of scar tissue, which happens with any foreign object in
the body.

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/bre...plants/AN01212

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

[email protected] January 3rd 09 06:15 PM

cantenna
 
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Billy Burpelson wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:

...
And swallowing something is -not- being "introduced directly into the
body"? I would have thought otherwise...


John Smith wrote:

I mean, "Come on!" You have to ask that?

A hypodermic needles injection is "directly." A swallowed substance is
directly introduced into the digestive tract, where it is the
assimilated into the blood ...


Huh? Are we both saying the same thing?

If a substance is injected by a hypodermic needle and then 'assimilated
into the blood', how is that different from you saying "A swallowed
substance is directly introduced into the digestive tract, where it is
the[n] assimilated into the blood ..."?

Seems like it gets into the blood stream (and is thus circulated around
the entire body) in -either- case. So your point is...?

Back to my original, bottom line question: is silicone in the blood
stream good for you or bad for you? (and yes, I DO have to ask, because
your response seems to make no sense).


It is not very likely to be "good" for you and depending on how much, it
could be "bad" for you.

But there is the bottom line question of how could an oranically inert
substance get into the blood stream other than through direct injection?

The question is like asking if glass in the blood stream is a problem.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Jeff Liebermann[_2_] January 4th 09 02:53 AM

cantenna
 
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 01:35:16 -0500, "NoSPAM"
wrote:

However, the Cantenna relies on natural
convection of the oil for cooling and the higher viscosity of commonly
available silicone oils will limit the power handling capability of the
Cantenna.


So, a low density fluid would be the better choice? If that were the
prime criteria, I would think that water or antifreeze would be the
best. If having convection currents agitate the fluid is important,
it would be easy enough to install a paddle stirrer and thermometer.
Oh wait. This is ham radio. Forget the thermometer.

I'm also wondering if the electrical characteristics of water are an
issue for an HF dummy load. Even if someone dumps salt water into the
paint can, the conduction losses to ground from the resistor to the
can ground can't be all that much below 30MHz.

Thermal Conductivity Viscosity
W/mK cSt @20c
Water 0.6 0.9
AF (glycol) 0.24 2.0
Water+AF 0.8(?) 1.5 50%/50%
Silicon Oil 0.1 varies radically
Mineral Oil 0.138 34.5
Fluorinert FC-77 0.063 0.75

Ok, I see why. Water has 1/5th of the thermal conductivity of mineral
oil. 50/50 water and antifreeze won't work. That raises the boiling
point but ruins the thermal conductivity. Pure ethylene glycol looks
tolerable. Other than the health and ecology issues, any reason that
100% antifreeze won't work?

Incidentally my theory is that the Heath engineers of the 1960's used
mineral oil because that's what's inside a Lava Lamp. They were
probably designing Heathkit Lava Lamps but when that failed, they had
to do something useful with the mineral oil.

Remember that the Cantenna must be de-rated when used for long
duty cycles, and a high viscosity oil will lower the power rating still
more. Also remember that silicone oils are not cheap (and my buddy at Dow
would only send me small samples).


Well, if you want expensive and near perfect, there's 3M Fluoinert.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorinert
http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/mediawebserver?66666UuZjcFSLXTtnxTE5X46EVuQEcuZgVs 6EVs6E666666--
About $400/liter for recycled FC-77 and $2,200/liter for the new
FC-770 stuff from various 3M dealers. A 1 gallon cantenna required
3.78 liters or about $1,500 in recycled FC-77. For those hams that
want the very best. Gold plated paint can is optional.

I would suggest using modern RF terminations made by Bourns and other
companies. These are designed to be bolted to a large heatsink. The
CHF9838CNF series is rated for 50 ohms, 250 watts, VSWR below 1.1 from DC
to 2.2 GHz. It only costs $27.50 in single lot quantities. I think this
is higher than the continuous rating of the Cantenna. I don't know for
sure as I disposed of my Cantenna years ago. Digi-Key sells these Bourns
terminations if you want one.


Nice. Thanks.
http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=CHF9838CNF500L-ND
http://www.mouser.com/Search/Refine.aspx?Msid=65210000&Keyword=CHF9838CNF500L
http://www.bourns.com/data/global/PDFs/CHF9838CNF.pdf
I kinda prefer to use 4ea 200 ohm loads in parallel. In a previous
power amp design, I had to dump 200 watts into a load if the antenna
failed. The thermal resistance of the flange mount was too high for
one device to handle the load at the rated temperatures. However, 4
devices did the trick.

Barry L. Ornitz, PhD WA4VZQ

--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

David Ryeburn January 4th 09 05:41 AM

cantenna
 
In article ,
Jeff Liebermann wrote:

I'm also wondering if the electrical characteristics of water are an
issue for an HF dummy load. Even if someone dumps salt water into the
paint can, the conduction losses to ground from the resistor to the
can ground can't be all that much below 30MHz.


It's probably not worth much, but here's some anecdotal evidence. About 50
years ago several of us at W8LT (The Ohio State University amateur radio
club) needed a low-power dummy load to be used at moderate frequencies (e.g.
20 meters). I came up with the idea of immersing a 2 watt, 51 ohm carbon
resistor in a large glass of Columbus, Ohio tap water. We found that at 14
MHz putting the resistor under water made negligible change in observed SWR,
which surprised me because Columbus water (unlike the stuff we're blessed
with here in the Vancouver, BC area which comes right from the mountain
snow-pack) was fairly hard. This also indicated that the water didn't put
too much capacitance in parallel with the resistance. Water-cooling did
allow the 2 watt resistor to absorb a fair bit more power than 2 watts, at
least for a while until the water heated up too much.

Thermal Conductivity Viscosity
W/mK cSt @20c
Water 0.6 0.9
AF (glycol) 0.24 2.0
Water+AF 0.8(?) 1.5 50%/50%
Silicon Oil 0.1 varies radically
Mineral Oil 0.138 34.5
Fluorinert FC-77 0.063 0.75

Ok, I see why. Water has 1/5th of the thermal conductivity of mineral
oil.


It's still a heck of a lot better than air.

As I recall, we were in a hurry, we had the resistor, and we didn't have any
suitable oil on hand.

David. ex-W8EZE

--
David Ryeburn

To send e-mail, use "ca" instead of "caz".

Jeff Liebermann[_2_] January 4th 09 06:13 AM

cantenna
 
On Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:53:59 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
wrote:

Thermal Conductivity Viscosity
W/mK cSt @20c
Water 0.6 0.9
AF (glycol) 0.24 2.0
Water+AF 0.8(?) 1.5 50%/50%
Silicon Oil 0.1 varies radically
Mineral Oil 0.138 34.5
Fluorinert FC-77 0.063 0.75


Air 0.025
Copper 370.
Diamond 1000.

Ok, I see why. Water has 1/5th of the thermal conductivity of mineral
oil. 50/50 water and antifreeze won't work. That raises the boiling
point but ruins the thermal conductivity. Pure ethylene glycol looks
tolerable. Other than the health and ecology issues, any reason that
100% antifreeze won't work?


Sorry, I goofed. Vicodin etc. It should be the higher the W/mK, the
better the thermal conductivity.

So why is Fluorinert favored for cooling when it has such a lousy
thermal conductivity?
http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/mediawebserver?66666UuZjcFSLXTtnxTE5X46EVuQEcuZgVs 6EVs6E666666--
Since it's usually circulated with a pump and involves direct
immersion, is it because of it's low viscosity and superior electrical
characteristics?

It would also appear that water has 5 times the thermal conductivity
than mineral oil. So, why use mineral oil?

--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

David G. Nagel January 4th 09 06:24 AM

cantenna
 
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:53:59 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
wrote:

Thermal Conductivity Viscosity
W/mK cSt @20c
Water 0.6 0.9
AF (glycol) 0.24 2.0
Water+AF 0.8(?) 1.5 50%/50%
Silicon Oil 0.1 varies radically
Mineral Oil 0.138 34.5
Fluorinert FC-77 0.063 0.75


Air 0.025
Copper 370.
Diamond 1000.

Ok, I see why. Water has 1/5th of the thermal conductivity of mineral
oil. 50/50 water and antifreeze won't work. That raises the boiling
point but ruins the thermal conductivity. Pure ethylene glycol looks
tolerable. Other than the health and ecology issues, any reason that
100% antifreeze won't work?


Sorry, I goofed. Vicodin etc. It should be the higher the W/mK, the
better the thermal conductivity.

So why is Fluorinert favored for cooling when it has such a lousy
thermal conductivity?
http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/mediawebserver?66666UuZjcFSLXTtnxTE5X46EVuQEcuZgVs 6EVs6E666666--
Since it's usually circulated with a pump and involves direct
immersion, is it because of it's low viscosity and superior electrical
characteristics?

It would also appear that water has 5 times the thermal conductivity
than mineral oil. So, why use mineral oil?


It doesn't turn to steam or otherwise evaporate.

Dave WD9BDZ

John Smith January 4th 09 06:32 AM

cantenna
 
Jeff Liebermann wrote:

...
... The thermal resistance of the flange mount was too high for

one device to handle the load at the rated temperatures. However, 4
devices did the trick.

Barry L. Ornitz, PhD WA4VZQ


Yeah, all that, and then try to sink 5KW+ into a paint can ... 20 X 1000
ohm resistors is very minimum, in a tubular aluminum heat-sink-no less,
in my humble opinion ... as when you are in key-down, and your attention
is diverted, things can get warm, quickly, or so it seems!

Regards,
JS

Telamon January 4th 09 08:21 AM

cantenna
 
In article ,
Jeff Liebermann wrote:

On Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:53:59 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
wrote:

Thermal Conductivity Viscosity
W/mK cSt @20c
Water 0.6 0.9
AF (glycol) 0.24 2.0
Water+AF 0.8(?) 1.5 50%/50%
Silicon Oil 0.1 varies radically
Mineral Oil 0.138 34.5
Fluorinert FC-77 0.063 0.75


Air 0.025
Copper 370.
Diamond 1000.

Ok, I see why. Water has 1/5th of the thermal conductivity of mineral
oil. 50/50 water and antifreeze won't work. That raises the boiling
point but ruins the thermal conductivity. Pure ethylene glycol looks
tolerable. Other than the health and ecology issues, any reason that
100% antifreeze won't work?


Sorry, I goofed. Vicodin etc. It should be the higher the W/mK, the
better the thermal conductivity.

So why is Fluorinert favored for cooling when it has such a lousy
thermal conductivity?


High resistivity
High dielectric strength
Low maintenance
Low corrosion = very compatible with most materials
Leaks don't cause more damage
low viscosity
Wide useful temperature range

http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/mediawe...E5X46EVuQEcuZg
Vs6EVs6E666666--
Since it's usually circulated with a pump and involves direct
immersion, is it because of it's low viscosity and superior electrical
characteristics?

It would also appear that water has 5 times the thermal conductivity
than mineral oil. So, why use mineral oil?


DI water is very corrosive and requires stainless steel heat transfer
radiators among other components. It is difficult to keep uncontaminated
and you have to keep changing filters for example. Get a leak and it
usually causes additional damage.

Mineral oil makes a mess and is old technology.

I know of one ATE manufacture that used DI water for cooling in the
mainframe and test head. What a mistake that was. Every time they had a
leak in the test head expensive boards got damaged.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

JIMMIE January 4th 09 10:06 AM

cantenna
 
On Jan 4, 3:21*am, Telamon
wrote:
In article ,
*Jeff Liebermann wrote:





On Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:53:59 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
wrote:


* * * * *Thermal Conductivity * * Viscosity
* * * * * * * * *W/mK * * * * * * * * cSt @20c
Water * * * * * * 0.6 * * * * * * * * *0..9
AF (glycol) * * * 0.24 * * * * * * * * 2.0
Water+AF * * * * *0.8(?) * * * * * * * 1.5 * 50%/50%
Silicon Oil * * * 0.1 * * * * * * * * *varies radically
Mineral Oil * * * 0.138 * * * * * * * *34.5
Fluorinert FC-77 *0.063 * * * * * * * *0.75


*Air * * * * * * * 0.025
*Copper * * * * *370.
*Diamond * * * *1000.


Ok, I see why. *Water has 1/5th of the thermal conductivity of mineral
oil. *50/50 water and antifreeze won't work. *That raises the boiling
point but ruins the thermal conductivity. *Pure ethylene glycol looks
tolerable. *Other than the health and ecology issues, any reason that
100% antifreeze won't work?


Sorry, I goofed. *Vicodin etc. *It should be the higher the W/mK, the
better the thermal conductivity. *


So why is Fluorinert favored for cooling when it has such a lousy
thermal conductivity?


High resistivity
High dielectric strength
Low maintenance
Low corrosion = very compatible with most materials
Leaks don't cause more damage
low viscosity
Wide useful temperature range

http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/mediawe...SLXTtnxTE5X46E....
Vs6EVs6E666666--
Since it's usually circulated with a pump and involves direct
immersion, is it because of it's low viscosity and superior electrical
characteristics?


It would also appear that water has 5 times the thermal conductivity
than mineral oil. *So, why use mineral oil?


DI water is very corrosive and requires stainless steel heat transfer
radiators among other components. It is difficult to keep uncontaminated
and you have to keep changing filters for example. Get a leak and it
usually causes additional damage.

Mineral oil makes a mess and is old technology.

I know of one ATE manufacture that used DI water for cooling in the
mainframe and test head. What a mistake that was. Every time they had a
leak in the test head expensive boards got damaged.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



No kidding on how messy mineral oil can be. I had a leak in a
recirculating pump and it put about 20 gal of oil on the carpeted
floor of the radar site. We had to take up the carpet and the asphalt
tile. The floor is now bare concrete because carpet is forbidden
around oil and the concrete will not take adhesive to put down new
tile.

Jimmie

HankG[_3_] January 4th 09 03:03 PM

cantenna
 

"Allodoxaphobia" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:36:17 -0500, Billy Burpelson wrote:

I am a bit puzzled. IIRC, the silicone in women's breast implants
would/could/did leak and cause fairly serious health problems. Yet, Dr.
Ornitz says "Silicone oils are excellent from a health standpoint" and
Mr. Smith says: "food grade".

Could anyone take a shot at explaining this apparent dichotomy?


Plaintiffs' lawyers and defendants' lawyers....


In the food industry, it is necessary to provide lubricants, coolants, etc.,
for the proper operation of equipment and preparation of product. The same
holds true in the pharmaceutical/medical device industries, where silicone
(medical grade 360) is used to lubricate rubber stoppers which are inserted
by machine into vials, etc.

There are at least 2 classifications: (1) product contact, and (2)
incidental product contact. These are essentially the same; just a matter
of degree.

They (silicones) are not a food ingredient.

HankG



Sal M. Onella January 5th 09 07:16 AM

cantenna
 

"JB" wrote in message
...
Mineral Oil (available at your local drug store).

Just be prepared for some strange looks when you purchase a gallon of
mineral oil all at once. :-O


Is motor oil a conductor?


Might burn and sludge up your resistor. Lots of additives you just don't
need.

I had a cantenna for 20 years with light mineral oil. there was a little
seepage to the top of the lid through the vent. I actually had

transformer
oil but never used it because of the thought of that stuff seeping. It
really is a lot cleaner. Check feed stores, Vet supply stores, paint
stores, hardware. Check this out:
http://www.pugetsystems.com/submerged.php


When I was in the Navy, we had some gear that used a high power TWT. It was
immersed in a bath of a fluorocarbon called FC-75, trade name Fluorinert.
Good heat conductor, great insulator, totally inert. Supposedly, you could
drink it. It's still around. Google FC-75 and wikipedia will tell you all
about it. $68/ten gallons is a little pricey for my Cantenna but you might
not think so.

Here's a summary of that chemical family's characteristics for the curious:
http://www.acota.co.uk/products/fluo...tronic-liquids



KC8QJP[_5_] January 5th 09 04:45 PM

cantenna
 

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Jeff Liebermann wrote:

...
... The thermal resistance of the flange mount was too high for

one device to handle the load at the rated temperatures. However, 4
devices did the trick.

Barry L. Ornitz, PhD WA4VZQ


Yeah, all that, and then try to sink 5KW+ into a paint can ... 20 X 1000
ohm resistors is very minimum, in a tubular aluminum heat-sink-no less, in
my humble opinion ... as when you are in key-down, and your attention is
diverted, things can get warm, quickly, or so it seems!


That's where the crisco comes in handy!



Regards,
JS




KC8QJP[_5_] January 5th 09 04:46 PM

cantenna
 

"HankG" wrote in message
...

"Allodoxaphobia" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:36:17 -0500, Billy Burpelson wrote:

I am a bit puzzled. IIRC, the silicone in women's breast implants
would/could/did leak and cause fairly serious health problems. Yet, Dr.
Ornitz says "Silicone oils are excellent from a health standpoint" and
Mr. Smith says: "food grade".

Could anyone take a shot at explaining this apparent dichotomy?


Plaintiffs' lawyers and defendants' lawyers....


In the food industry, it is necessary to provide lubricants, coolants,
etc., for the proper operation of equipment and preparation of product.
The same holds true in the pharmaceutical/medical device industries, where
silicone (medical grade 360) is used to lubricate rubber stoppers which
are inserted by machine into vials, etc.

There are at least 2 classifications: (1) product contact, and (2)
incidental product contact. These are essentially the same; just a matter
of degree.

They (silicones) are not a food ingredient.


The crisco is!


HankG




KC8QJP[_5_] January 5th 09 05:00 PM

cantenna
 

"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message
...

"RF BURNS" wrote in message
...
"KC8QJP" wrote in message
. ..
a crisco can works well

http://www.radiobanter.com/showpost....73&postcount=1


Dave wrote:

leave the crisco in it and after tuning up you can fry your dinner!


...and fry your arteries with all the cholesterol!


We make deep fried fatback sandwiches with it.



[email protected] January 11th 09 10:54 PM

cantenna
 
Modern dielectric oil (aka transformer oil) is refined mineral oil
with an antioxidant (tocopherol, BHA, or BHT) added to retard
spoiling.

Shell Diala AX
ExxonMobil Univolt 65

are the two major kinds (there's one from Castrol,too)

Both are sold (in 5 gallon pails, typically, as a minimum quantity) by
"jobbers" which can be found on the mfr's website (you enter a zip
code and gives you the distributors within X miles), or by looking in
the yellow pages under Oil,Lubricants-Jobbers. Used to be in the $4-5/
gallon range, but I just was talking to someone who had to pay around
$50 for a 5gallon pail. (probably a hangover from $100/bbl crude
prices)

You *can* use USP White Mineral Oil (laxative) available in pints at
the drugstore, gallons at the feedstore (If you've got a colicky
horse, gallons are the quantity wanted), but it's
a) more expensive
b) not water content controlled

For HV dielectric purposes water content (in the ppm range) is
important. So is particulate contamination. For a dummy load,
probably not so much.

Another inexpensive source of mineral oil without many additives is
hydraulic oil (as used in, say, tractors, etc.).

Even "straight weight" motor oil without additives/detergents can work
(look for the SAE 10,15, or 20 viscosities).. it can be VERY cheap on
sale as a "loss leader" to get folks into the store (since nobody in
their right mind would actually run this in an engine)

For a dummy load, viscosity IS important, because convective flow is
important. (viscosity change with temperature, too...)

Silicone would be massive overkill, and we won't even get into
Fluorinert. BTW, if you spill mineral oil, it cleans up nicely with
detergent and water.. the same cannot be said of silicone or FC-xx..
Silicone oils are almost impossible to remove.

Jim, w6rmk

Art Unwin January 12th 09 12:24 AM

cantenna
 
On Jan 1, 9:49*am, "KC8QJP" wrote:
"John Passaneau" wrote in message

... KC8QJP wrote:
a crisco can works well

Sometimes you can get empty paint cans at professional paint supplies
stores. They are nice as they are clean and shiny.


John W3JXP


Thanks for the tip!


Yes. I did that The new can had a plastic type coating on the inside
to prevent any possible leaks and corrosion, a great improvement over
cans of yesteryear that leaked on to the floor over time. Same story
for the lid., Cost me something like $3 and well worth it.
Art

NoSPAM January 12th 09 01:24 AM

cantenna
 
wrote in message
...

Modern dielectric oil (aka transformer oil) is refined mineral oil
with an antioxidant (tocopherol, BHA, or BHT) added to retard
spoiling.


Mineral oil does not "spoil" in the sense that animal or vegetable fats
(long chain carboxylic acids) do. Tocopherol (Vitamin E),
butylated-hydroxyanisole and butylated-hydroxytoluene are used (in the low
part per million range) to prevent oxidation of the oil which produces
"sludge" and "varnish" (here used as referring to deposits from
hydrocarbons such as gasoline on fuel tanks and carburetters). All three
compounds are also used in the food industry - to prevent spoilage. :-)

Shell Diala AX
ExxonMobil Univolt 65

are the two major kinds (there's one from Castrol,too)

Both are sold (in 5 gallon pails, typically, as a minimum quantity) by
"jobbers" which can be found on the mfr's website (you enter a zip
code and gives you the distributors within X miles), or by looking in
the yellow pages under Oil,Lubricants-Jobbers. Used to be in the $4-5/
gallon range, but I just was talking to someone who had to pay around
$50 for a 5gallon pail. (probably a hangover from $100/bbl crude
prices)

You *can* use USP White Mineral Oil (laxative) available in pints at
the drugstore, gallons at the feedstore (If you've got a colicky
horse, gallons are the quantity wanted), but it's
a) more expensive
b) not water content controlled

For HV dielectric purposes water content (in the ppm range) is
important. So is particulate contamination. For a dummy load,
probably not so much.


The partioning coefficient of agricultural grade white mineral oil is
greater than one million. Dissolved water will have no measurable effect
on the dummy load.

Another inexpensive source of mineral oil without many additives is
hydraulic oil (as used in, say, tractors, etc.).

Even "straight weight" motor oil without additives/detergents can work
(look for the SAE 10,15, or 20 viscosities).. it can be VERY cheap on
sale as a "loss leader" to get folks into the store (since nobody in
their right mind would actually run this in an engine)


For good natural convection around and through the Kanthal-Globar silicon
carbide resistor used in the Cantenna, I would use no higher a viscosity
oil than SAE 5.

For a dummy load, viscosity IS important, because convective flow is
important. (viscosity change with temperature, too...)


Most organic oils are less viscous at higher temperatures. This is good in
the Cantenna application. The lubricating properties of the oil are
unimportant here.

Silicone would be massive overkill, and we won't even get into
Fluorinert. BTW, if you spill mineral oil, it cleans up nicely with
detergent and water.. the same cannot be said of silicone or FC-xx..
Silicone oils are almost impossible to remove.


This is an excellent point. Freon TF®
(1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane) was excellent for removing silicone
oils and greases, and it had a number of physical properties that made it
ideal for many electronic applications. It is too bad that it is banned as
a ozone destroying chlorofluorocarbon. In looking at some of the
alternatives for cleaning away silicone oils, I would suggest looking at
Caig Laboratories (makers of DeoxIT®) CaiKleen NF which is mainly
1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane. Unfortunately its boiling point is 15 C (59
F) and it is quite expensive.

Good post, Jim!

73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ


David G. Nagel January 12th 09 03:25 AM

cantenna
 
Art Unwin wrote:
On Jan 1, 9:49 am, "KC8QJP" wrote:
"John Passaneau" wrote in message

... KC8QJP wrote:
a crisco can works well
Sometimes you can get empty paint cans at professional paint supplies
stores. They are nice as they are clean and shiny.
John W3JXP

Thanks for the tip!


Yes. I did that The new can had a plastic type coating on the inside
to prevent any possible leaks and corrosion, a great improvement over
cans of yesteryear that leaked on to the floor over time. Same story
for the lid., Cost me something like $3 and well worth it.
Art

The hole in the lid of a Heathkit Cantenna was to allow for expansion
due to heat buildup in the oil during heavy use. Make sure you allow for
this expansion in any sealed container if you roll your own cantenna.

Dave WD9BDZ

John Passaneau January 13th 09 12:36 AM

cantenna
 
NoSPAM wrote:
wrote in message
...

Modern dielectric oil (aka transformer oil) is refined mineral oil
with an antioxidant (tocopherol, BHA, or BHT) added to retard
spoiling.


Mineral oil does not "spoil" in the sense that animal or vegetable fats
(long chain carboxylic acids) do. Tocopherol (Vitamin E),
butylated-hydroxyanisole and butylated-hydroxytoluene are used (in the
low part per million range) to prevent oxidation of the oil which
produces "sludge" and "varnish" (here used as referring to deposits from
hydrocarbons such as gasoline on fuel tanks and carburetters). All
three compounds are also used in the food industry - to prevent
spoilage. :-)

Shell Diala AX
ExxonMobil Univolt 65

are the two major kinds (there's one from Castrol,too)

Both are sold (in 5 gallon pails, typically, as a minimum quantity) by
"jobbers" which can be found on the mfr's website (you enter a zip
code and gives you the distributors within X miles), or by looking in
the yellow pages under Oil,Lubricants-Jobbers. Used to be in the $4-5/
gallon range, but I just was talking to someone who had to pay around
$50 for a 5gallon pail. (probably a hangover from $100/bbl crude
prices)

You *can* use USP White Mineral Oil (laxative) available in pints at
the drugstore, gallons at the feedstore (If you've got a colicky
horse, gallons are the quantity wanted), but it's
a) more expensive
b) not water content controlled

For HV dielectric purposes water content (in the ppm range) is
important. So is particulate contamination. For a dummy load,
probably not so much.


The partioning coefficient of agricultural grade white mineral oil is
greater than one million. Dissolved water will have no measurable
effect on the dummy load.

Another inexpensive source of mineral oil without many additives is
hydraulic oil (as used in, say, tractors, etc.).

Even "straight weight" motor oil without additives/detergents can work
(look for the SAE 10,15, or 20 viscosities).. it can be VERY cheap on
sale as a "loss leader" to get folks into the store (since nobody in
their right mind would actually run this in an engine)


For good natural convection around and through the Kanthal-Globar
silicon carbide resistor used in the Cantenna, I would use no higher a
viscosity oil than SAE 5.

For a dummy load, viscosity IS important, because convective flow is
important. (viscosity change with temperature, too...)


Most organic oils are less viscous at higher temperatures. This is good
in the Cantenna application. The lubricating properties of the oil are
unimportant here.

Silicone would be massive overkill, and we won't even get into
Fluorinert. BTW, if you spill mineral oil, it cleans up nicely with
detergent and water.. the same cannot be said of silicone or FC-xx..
Silicone oils are almost impossible to remove.


This is an excellent point. Freon TF®
(1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane) was excellent for removing
silicone oils and greases, and it had a number of physical properties
that made it ideal for many electronic applications. It is too bad that
it is banned as a ozone destroying chlorofluorocarbon. In looking at
some of the alternatives for cleaning away silicone oils, I would
suggest looking at Caig Laboratories (makers of DeoxIT®) CaiKleen NF
which is mainly 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane. Unfortunately its boiling
point is 15 C (59 F) and it is quite expensive.

Good post, Jim!

73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ

Hi all:

Great post with lots of good info. But look for a power line transformer
there are very high voltages and a lot of power. In a Ham dummy load the
max voltage on the resistor would be about 275V at 1500w. Unless your a
CB'er you will not see more than that. So hundreds, my self includeDd
Ham's have use common mineral oil from the drug store with fine results.
So go for it. The last time I was took part in filling a dummy load was
back in the seventy's. I was helping friend move into a new house and
set up the ham shack. We needed to get new oil for the dummy load as we
had dumped the old oil rather than move it full and take the chance of
it spilling. So we went to the store and got the oil and along with it
we picked up some water glasses and repair parts for a toilet. The check
out girl looked at us kind of funny and I really did my friend
reputation in by telling her we had found a new way to turn on...


John Passaneau, W3JXP

Jim Lux January 13th 09 01:26 AM

cantenna
 
John Passaneau wrote:


Great post with lots of good info. But look for a power line transformer
there are very high voltages and a lot of power. In a Ham dummy load the
max voltage on the resistor would be about 275V at 1500w. Unless your a
CB'er you will not see more than that. So hundreds, my self includeDd
Ham's have use common mineral oil from the drug store with fine results.



The issue isn't the water content or particulate contamination (which
affect the HV behavior) but the viscosity. Diala AX (for instance) is
quite low viscosity. 9.7 cSt/56 SUS at 40C, 2.3cSt/34SUS at 100C

http://www.nttworldwide.com/docs/diala-ax.pdf

9cSt (mm^2/s) is about the dividing line between SAW 20 and 30 AT 100C,
so Diala AX is a lot less viscous than even 20 weight motor oil (2.3cSt
vs 9.3 cSt)

The typical Mineral Oil, USP, heavy at a drug store is around 34cSt
viscosity (3-4 times heavier).

Diala pours pretty readily.. I'd say about like half and half, but not
as thick as whipping cream.

That's important for the heat transfer, because you need the circulation
inside the load (unless you're just pulsing it..) By the way, that's
why the rating on the Cantenna is different for USP mineral oil and
insulating oil.
http://www.mfjenterprises.com/man/pdf/MFJ-250.pdf

for 10minute duration, the rating is about 60% when using mineral oil
instead of transformer oil.

For long durations, the whole thing gets hot and reaches thermal
equilibrium.

For short durations, the lower viscosity transformer oil moves the heat
away from the resistor faster keeping it at lower temperature.


That said, most hams aren't going to run their dummy load at full power
for 10 minutes at a crack.

JIMMIE January 13th 09 05:28 PM

cantenna
 
On Jan 1, 8:34*pm, "Bob Campbell" wrote:
"JIMMIE" wrote in message

...

Nothing wrong with PoCo oil. They havent used PCBs in years. We use
the same stuff at work made by Shell . Its just mineral oil with a few
additives.


That's good to know.


I have a 200 watt air cooled dummy load made of 2 watt resistors. I
was curious as to how much power it could safley disipate if placed in
a gallon container of mineral oil. It seems to handle 200 watts
continuously with just a muffin fan on it.

Jimmie

John Passaneau January 13th 09 10:57 PM

cantenna
 
JIMMIE wrote:
On Jan 1, 8:34 pm, "Bob Campbell" wrote:
"JIMMIE" wrote in message

...

Nothing wrong with PoCo oil. They havent used PCBs in years. We use
the same stuff at work made by Shell . Its just mineral oil with a few
additives.

That's good to know.


I have a 200 watt air cooled dummy load made of 2 watt resistors. I
was curious as to how much power it could safley disipate if placed in
a gallon container of mineral oil. It seems to handle 200 watts
continuously with just a muffin fan on it.

Jimmie


Not an easy question to answer. allot depends on how the thing is made.
How much power it can handle is controlled by how fast the heat can be
moved away. It doesn't matter if it's oil or air. In oil the speed is
set by how obstructed the path the hot oil would need to travel to get
away from the part thats making the heat. I think the resistor in a
cantenna in free air is only good for about 50 watts but it designed for
the smooth passage of the oil around the resistor. I don't think that
your mass of 2 watt resistors will allow the oil to pass freely enough
to get to a KW for vary long. If you used a pump to move the oil it
would work better in the same way that a fan works.

John Passaneau

Jim-NN7K[_2_] January 14th 09 03:46 AM

cantenna
 
One other thing might check out, is the Salt Water Dummy Loads
(on several web sites). One mearly uses (can, Jar with lid),
and with metal plates attached to coax connector, filled
with salt water - Fill with water, then with ohm meter , add
Salt until the brine hits 50 ohms! Tho, don't know how high
frequency it is reliable to, should work to at least 50 MHz.
Jim NN7K


John Passaneau wrote:
JIMMIE wrote:
On Jan 1, 8:34 pm, "Bob Campbell" wrote:
"JIMMIE" wrote in message

...


Nothing wrong with PoCo oil. They havent used PCBs in years. We use
the same stuff at work made by Shell . Its just mineral oil with a few
additives.
That's good to know.


I have a 200 watt air cooled dummy load made of 2 watt resistors. I
was curious as to how much power it could safley disipate if placed in
a gallon container of mineral oil. It seems to handle 200 watts
continuously with just a muffin fan on it.

Jimmie


Not an easy question to answer. allot depends on how the thing is made.
How much power it can handle is controlled by how fast the heat can be
moved away. It doesn't matter if it's oil or air. In oil the speed is
set by how obstructed the path the hot oil would need to travel to get
away from the part thats making the heat. I think the resistor in a
cantenna in free air is only good for about 50 watts but it designed for
the smooth passage of the oil around the resistor. I don't think that
your mass of 2 watt resistors will allow the oil to pass freely enough
to get to a KW for vary long. If you used a pump to move the oil it
would work better in the same way that a fan works.

John Passaneau


NoSPAM January 16th 09 09:59 PM

cantenna [salt water dummy loads]
 
"Jim-NN7K" . wrote in message
...
One other thing might check out, is the Salt Water Dummy Loads
(on several web sites). One mearly uses (can, Jar with lid),
and with metal plates attached to coax connector, filled
with salt water - Fill with water, then with ohm meter , add
Salt until the brine hits 50 ohms! Tho, don't know how high
frequency it is reliable to, should work to at least 50 MHz.
Jim NN7K



Back in the mid-1960's there was an article in QST where they did this.
The load will definitely be frequency dependent as demonstrated by
experimental results. Also the salt used will effect the results. From a
theoretical standpoint, the mobility of ions is dependent on the size of
the ion. The bigger the ion, the slower it will move. This conveniently
explains much of what is seen in ground losses and is why electrolytic
capacitors are essentially useless above 1 MHz. The ions cannot move fast
enough in the small times seen per cycle, so the current falls off. Ion
mobility also decreases as the temperature drops which explains why
electrolytic capacitors also do poorly at low temperatures.

I have done as Jim suggested when testing a kilowatt amplifier on 80
Meters. The load is useless if the water boils!

73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ


Richard Clark January 17th 09 01:44 AM

cantenna [salt water dummy loads]
 
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:59:29 -0500, "NoSPAM"
wrote:

I have done as Jim suggested when testing a kilowatt amplifier on 80
Meters. The load is useless if the water boils!


Is this the dawn of another debate over power in standing waves?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Sal M. Onella January 17th 09 06:06 AM

cantenna
 

"Jim-NN7K" . wrote in message
...
One other thing might check out, is the Salt Water Dummy Loads
(on several web sites). One mearly uses (can, Jar with lid),
and with metal plates attached to coax connector, filled
with salt water - Fill with water, then with ohm meter , add
Salt until the brine hits 50 ohms! Tho, don't know how high
frequency it is reliable to, should work to at least 50 MHz.
Jim NN7K


Generator tests (60 or 400 Hz, multi-KW) are routinely performed with a
trailer-mounted device called a load bank, where plates are immersed into a
tank of salt water. The depth of the plates determines the load resistance.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com