Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 11, 7:36*pm, Cecil Moore wrote:
Art Unwin wrote: I would have no problem of accepting the presence of photons but the link you gave me stated that it had zero mass. If they didn't say zero *rest* mass, they should have. A particle with zero rest mass cannot ever travel at the speed of light as its mass would increase without limit. Photons do travel at the speed of light but are known to possess energy and momentum which is equivalent to mass related by e=mc^2. -- 73, Cecil *http://www.w5dxp.com That is my point Cecil It would take me years at my slow rate to get up to par to even discuss it let alone debate. No mass one minute and mass the next minute, absolutely facinating, but beyond my ken and time is short Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Minimum photons-per-second [amplitude] required for 150 KHz? | Antenna | |||
Minimum photons-per-second [amplitude] required for 150 KHz? | Shortwave |