On Jan 14, 2:46*am, Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:
Dave wrote:
*"Art Unwin" wrote in message
...

( I am assuming that skin depthg is not limitless.)
*of course it is limitless, it is an exponential function so it never
goes to zero. *the so called 'skin depth' is only the point where the
current has dropped to 1/e or about 37% of the surface value, still a
significant current.

The plots at the link Frank provided show current going rather abruptly
to zero - even negative ("contrary"?) in some cases. *I wouldn't
presume to know whether it is modeled correctly.

Decrease of RF current with depth below the surface of a conductor is
only a true exponential if the available conductor depth is infinite.
In the modeled situations where there is 'competition' from a skin
effect on the opposite side of the conductor, the solution is a Bessel
function which does pass through zero and reverse direction at certain
depths.

In other words, the model is behaving as expected.

Programs such as NEC and Maxwell are not released until they have gone
through a very detailed process of checking and validation. The first
step is to check against *special cases that can be independently solved
by analytical methods (in other words, pure math). The work isn't
complete until all the results agree within close margins, and the
reasons for any differences are fully understood.

By the time we amateurs come to hear about these programs, they have
already been thoroughly validated by developers and professional users.
That doesn't make them immune from further criticism... but only by
people who have done the work to earn that right.

--

73 from Ian GM3SEKhttp://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek

So the developers know why the programs in the final analysis
gyrate towards radiators and arrays in equilibrium?
Do you know what that reason is?
Present thinking, I thought, suggest that the skin depth is quite thin
when used
for non destructive testing of materials. Is that also known by the
developers?
If the providing current is on the surface of a radiator then why does
the resulting eddy current
penetrate to the limits? Seems a sort of scrambled assumptions at play
here!