Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
Art wrote: "David just for the record, skin depth is proportional to frequency----." Not exactly. Skin depth is inversely proportional to the square root of the frequency. For example at 1 Hz the skin depth is about 2.6 in. in copper. At 10 Hz. it is about 0.826 in. and at 100 Hz the depth is about 0.260 in. and at 1000 Hz the depth is 0.0826 in. etc. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI Actually, skin depth is inversely proportional to the square root of frequency only in a good conductor like copper. Some common materials like dirt are fairly good conductors at low frequencies but behave more like dielectrics at higher frequencies. And skin depth doesn't change with frequency in a dielectric. For "average" ground (0.005 S/m conductivity, permittivity of 13), the transition between conductor behavior and dielectric behavior is at about 6.9 MHz, in the middle of the HF range. Well below that frequency, the skin depth changes in inverse proportion to the square root of the frequency; above it, the skin depth stays nearly constant. For "average" ground: Freq MHz Skin Depth m 0.01 71.2 0.5 10.4 1 7.6 2 5.8 4 4.7 6.9 4.2 8 4.1 16 3.9 100 3.8 Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tilted radiator | Antenna | |||
Circuitry of a radiator | Antenna | |||
internal antenna current flow | Antenna | |||
Mechanics of AC current flow - ? | Antenna | |||
KB9RQZ: WHY DO YOU PERPETUATE LIES AND DISHONESTY IN THE FACE OF GOOGLE ARCHIVES TO THE CONTRARY? | Policy |