Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 23, 5:05*pm, "Dave" wrote:
"Richard Harrison" wrote in message ... Art wrote: "David just for the record, skin depth is proportional to frequency----." Not exactly. Skin depth is inversely proportional to the square root of the frequency. For example at 1 Hz the skin depth is about 2.6 in. in copper. At 10 Hz.. it is about 0.826 in. and at 100 Hz the depth is about 0.260 in. and at 1000 Hz the depth is 0.0826 in. etc. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI don't confuse him with the facts! My facts were correct as stated. Richard stated the "exact" proportions which is really nit picking. Physics books say it is "proportional" which states that it is frequency change what affects skin depth. It is stated exactly that way in the book that Richard has just obtained and quoted Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tilted radiator | Antenna | |||
Circuitry of a radiator | Antenna | |||
internal antenna current flow | Antenna | |||
Mechanics of AC current flow - ? | Antenna | |||
KB9RQZ: WHY DO YOU PERPETUATE LIES AND DISHONESTY IN THE FACE OF GOOGLE ARCHIVES TO THE CONTRARY? | Policy |