Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art Unwin wrote:
On Jan 30, 10:00 am, Michael Coslo wrote: Warning - dilletente alert! Maybe even worth an embarrassing dolt cringe This question may have been asked before, but is there a physical experiment that is good for verifying skin effect? Initially, It seemed pretty straightforward, but giving some thought to the matter indicates it "ain't necessarily so". I'm assuming that any thick conductor is going to have "skin" to any where I can put a sensor, so even if I drilled an internal sensor, the drill tunnel would form a part of the skin. Giving that some thought, is it possible to make say a ribbed conductor that resembled a tubular heat sink, would this device allow for more current flow because of the greater amount of skin exposed compared to a solid tube? Just a little thought experiment. - 73 de Mike N3LI - All charges will congregate along the peaks of the ribs so I can't see how a greater area is generated for utelization ! Is what you are saying then that it is not truly a "skin" effect, which would have the maximum current riding near the surface, but rather some sort of effect that has that maximum current getting as far away from the center of the conductor? In other words the vertical component of the ribbing would have current flow as if it were at that distance from the surface of a solid conductor. Not trying to change th eworld here, just trying to get my head around the issue. Lot's of things have misnomers as a name. - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tilted radiator | Antenna | |||
Circuitry of a radiator | Antenna | |||
internal antenna current flow | Antenna | |||
Mechanics of AC current flow - ? | Antenna | |||
KB9RQZ: WHY DO YOU PERPETUATE LIES AND DISHONESTY IN THE FACE OF GOOGLE ARCHIVES TO THE CONTRARY? | Policy |