Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Michael Coslo wrote: Warning - dilletente alert! Maybe even worth an embarrassing dolt cringe This question may have been asked before, but is there a physical experiment that is good for verifying skin effect? Here's one, fairly simple in principle although I imagine it would require care in the implementation in order to prevent measurement error due to other effects. [1] Construct a balanced transmission line using a pair of solid cylindrical conductors, having a known characteristic impedance. [2] Terminate this transmission line with a dummy load - a pure resistance which matches the line's characteristic impedance. [3] Drive this transmission line via a suitable RF signal generator or source, having a known (or carefully measured) output power into the line's impedance. [4] Measure the RF power delivered into the line, and the RF power being dissipated by the dummy load. This could be done via an RF millivoltmeter, for instance. [5] Calculate the amount of power being lost in the transmission line. [6] Replace the solid cylindrical conductors in the transmission line with tubular conductors of the exact same material - hollow in the center, but with a wall width of at least 5 skin depths at the frequency you are using. Make sure that the outer diameter, and spacing of the tubular conductors matches the OD and spacing of the solid-conductor version of the line. [7] Drive this new line, and repeat the measurements and calculate the loss in this line. [8] Calculate the cross-sectional area of the solid conductor, and of the actual conductive portion of the hollow tubular conductor, and then the ratio between the two. [9] Calculate the ratio between the power losses in the two types of transmission line. [10] Compare these two ratios. You could in principle do a similar test by making two dipoles out of solid and tubular elements, driving them with identical signals, and measuring the field strength. I suspect this test would be harder to do reliabily. In either case, what you ought to be able to demonstrate, is that two transmission lines (one solid-conductor , the other hollow-conductor, but otherwise identical) which are long enough to exhibit substantial losses (e.g. 3 dB or 50% of the input power) would have near-identical losses, even though the amount of conductive material in the hollow-conductor line is less than 10% that of that in the solid-conductor line. This would be good evidence that only the outer perimeter of the solid conductors was carrying a significant amount of current, since "removing the center" doesn't decrease the loss. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tilted radiator | Antenna | |||
Circuitry of a radiator | Antenna | |||
internal antenna current flow | Antenna | |||
Mechanics of AC current flow - ? | Antenna | |||
KB9RQZ: WHY DO YOU PERPETUATE LIES AND DISHONESTY IN THE FACE OF GOOGLE ARCHIVES TO THE CONTRARY? | Policy |