Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Coslo wrote:
Warning - dilletente alert! Maybe even worth an embarrassing dolt cringe This question may have been asked before, but is there a physical experiment that is good for verifying skin effect? Initially, It seemed pretty straightforward, but giving some thought to the matter indicates it "ain't necessarily so". I'm assuming that any thick conductor is going to have "skin" to any where I can put a sensor, so even if I drilled an internal sensor, the drill tunnel would form a part of the skin. Giving that some thought, is it possible to make say a ribbed conductor that resembled a tubular heat sink, would this device allow for more current flow because of the greater amount of skin exposed compared to a solid tube? yes. Look up Litz wire.. basically the same idea However, just because it's not physically connected doesn't mean that the magnetic field from a rib wouldn't affect the current in the adjacent ribs (which is what's going on with the whole skin effect thing, anyway).. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tilted radiator | Antenna | |||
Circuitry of a radiator | Antenna | |||
internal antenna current flow | Antenna | |||
Mechanics of AC current flow - ? | Antenna | |||
KB9RQZ: WHY DO YOU PERPETUATE LIES AND DISHONESTY IN THE FACE OF GOOGLE ARCHIVES TO THE CONTRARY? | Policy |