Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Before I finish up with a comparison between a rotating combo dipole and
the weel known beverage antenna for 160M there are a few loose ends to tie up and ofcourse I will not be describing the clustered array types. Moxons book came at the right time for me as I wanted an antenna to reflect somewhat a transceiver where the antenna design reflected a moveable bandwidth of a consistant Q and not one where a radio "scans" frequency response as in a spectrum analyser. The Moxon book gave the answer that I wanted to read to give me further encouragement, It refered to where ZUKOV stated that radiation theoretically could emanate from a point and thus one could read in to that statement that length (wavelength) should not be the focal point for antenna design after all it would be very difficult to find anything in a book that focussed around length. If a point radiation can be realised then length was not a primary factor instead it was the passive loads that was carried by 'Length". When Moxon chose the twenty metre length for his resonator or combo dipole this blurred the impact with respect to what lengthand constituent passive loads meant,so he chose a random length of random diameter for his arrangement, after all to factor in the many resistances involved in radiation without a computor in reverse complex circuitry aproach would have taken a hundred years. Fortunately he hit on a suitable size radiator and he was able to procede even tho he made poor choices later. The initial arrange ment is shon in his book plus interesting longhand formula with respect to coupling and corresponding antenna performance data. Members of the attack group also found an old page of mine which descibes my interpretations and they also have referred to a couple of write ups that I did in patent form that clearly shows the arrangement as did many drawing I made for this newsgroup. Nobody was able to duplicate Moxons work hich led to the formation of a attack group, I theorise that the reason that no one could do it was because of a fascination for the EZNEC program which tho one time a leader in computor analysis was quickly outpaced by present day modern designs. The EZNEC program really revolves around providing characteristics around a previously designed antenna only and not the best arrangement that can be obtained. For best antenna available one needs the option of assigning variable values for a design together with large point of moments assignments so that not only close coupling could be performed with accuracy but length could be of secondary importance to lumped and distributed passive components both of which can now be variable. To accomplish what Moxon did is impossible to duplicate if one ignores distributed loads in a parallel configuration. Another thing that escaped the naysayers was that talk of lumped loads in a radiating array placed them in a fixed mind position where they still hung on to a wavelength design and put these lumped loads at the feed point to represent an external matching system which defeats the total intent of a parallel circuit radiating antenna which provided high Q signal passage which does not require an external matching system which is known to be lossy for large size antennas. The next post will be the last post for the moment because clusterred antenna design is still ongoing. I have chosen the 160 mtre rotatable dipole as a base as the initial designs of parallel circuitry revolved around bands that have now declined. I have chosen to compare it with a simple beverage antenna even tho this \beverage is not used as a transmitting antenna but for its listenning abilities. I might add at this point that when I rotated my loop/dipole antenna from the horizontal position to the vertical position I did not get the expected ground noise addition that I expected. This I attributed to the coupling function of the antenna which I believe has the ability to remove extranious noise. Have at it 'experts" you should now be able to portray what Moxon achieved by the correct use of computorised antenna programs now knowing the truth of prior efforts that substantiated the saying of "Garbage in equals garbage out" especially in the attack mode when one is inclined to listen only to that he wants to hear or substitute for what he thinks he should have heard. Art Unwin KB9MZ....XG |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
messing with a car radio | Antenna | |||
What Exactly is a Radio Wave? | Antenna | |||
How to connect external antenna to GE Super Radio III | Antenna | |||
Review: Amateur Radio Companion 3rd Edition | Antenna | |||
Amateur Radio Legal Issues List | Antenna |