Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, JIMMIE writes On Jan 31, 5:01*am, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Chevy454 writes In message , dave writes But why the trunk lid? Surely the roof is better? On a vehicle, every inch above the ground helps. The car is being used for 2M fox hunting. *The Doppler antennas are on the roof. *The MFJ-1728B is on the trunk lid. Are you saying that the 6 dB gain of this antenna is not high enough for a 20 degree tilt to make a difference? Ken KC2JDY Noted about the roof already being occupied. Obviously, if the antenna is 'leaning backwards' at 20 degrees, the radiation in the forward direction is going to point upwards more than it would if ie was vertical and, of course, to the rear, the radiation will point more downwards. However, even with the antenna dead vertical, the shape of the body of the vehicle will distort the radiation pattern considerably. I've had a quick Google, and this is one site which provides some info: http://www.k6mhe.com/files/mobile_vhf_ant.pdf There will be lots of others. This also might be of interest: http://74.125.77.132/search?q=cache:...st.com.au/Ante nnas/overview.html+antenna%2Bradiation%2B%225/8+wavelength%22&hl=en&ct=cl nk&cd=25&gl=uk As I said, you probably won't notice much difference between vertical and 20 degrees. But the only way to find out will be to try it. -- Ian I think I remember from some place that tilting a vertical monopole operating against a counterpoise increases the take off angle in both the direction it is tilted and the direction opposite. I welcome correction if I am in error. Jimmie No. You are correct. At VHF/UHF, with a vertical antenna over ground, the strongest radiation is always at an angle upwards (say 10 to 40 degrees, depending on the type of antenna). If you tilt the antenna over, the angle of radiation is therefore lower in the direction of the tilt, and higher in the opposite direction. On a vehicle, a whip with a 'sporty' rearwards rake will probably radiate somewhat better towards the back. However, I wouldn't lose too much sleep about it. As for the increased radiation in the direction of a counterpoise (or radial), it is in that direction that the counterpoise provides a better 'mirror image' of the antenna. This augments the radiation in that direction. -- Ian |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Capacitive coupling of magmount | Antenna | |||
Bend in xmission line | Antenna | |||
Dave ahs gone round the bend no religion that does not follow chrsitian teaching is allowed | Policy | |||
Drill vs. MagMount ?? | Antenna | |||
FS:NMO 5' MAGMOUNT WITH COAX | Swap |