Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Old Ed wrote:
2. If trees are assumed to be available to support dipoles, then trees could be used to support a monopole. But trees absorb energy from the monopole which has no gain to waste. Trees absorb virtually no energy from a dipole. 3. As to the gain figure, you seem to assume that the dipole is always operating at the peak of one of its lobes, and never has to operate in one of its nulls. I never operate my antenna in a null. I also don't drive my pickup one mile per hour even if I only average driving it one hour per day. Seems by your logic, I should always walk since I can walk faster than the average speed of my pickup over any 24 hour period. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna |