Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Fry wrote:
But it doesn't mean that a self-resonant, normal-mode helix has the radiation resistance and radiation system efficiency of a linear, 1/4-wave monopole (other things equal). Here's a data point. Awhile back, using EZNEC to simulate the delay through a 75m bugcatcher loading coil, I used the coil pretty close to its self-resonant frequency of ~7 MHz. It had a 4 inch bottom section and a 4 inch stinger so the antenna is about 14 inches long. The resonant feedpoint impedance is 2 ohms (not including ground losses) and the maximum gain is -14.8 dB. Assuming a typical 1/4WL monopole has a maximum gain of 0 dB, the 1/4WL monopole is 30x the efficiency of this short "helical" antenna on 6.85 MHz. So it seems that the radiation resistance is ~1/30 that of a 1/4WL monopole using mininec ground simulation. Incidentally, a resonant helical monopole obviously has a 90 degree delay from feedpoint to tip. The reason that virtually zero phase shift occurs through the coil is that one is sampling standing-wave current phase which doesn't change (much) whether it is through a coil or through a 1/4WL wire. Quoting my web page at: http://www.w5dxp.com/current2.htm "Standing wave current cannot be used to directly measure either a valid amplitude change or a valid phase shift through a loading coil. All of the reported conclusions based on loading coil measurements using standing-wave current on standing-wave antennas are conceptually flawed." -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Elevation Patterns of Ground Mounted Vertical Monopoles | Antenna | |||
FA: Air Wound Coil 21 | Swap | |||
FA: Air Wound Coil | Swap | |||
Vertical dipole, helically wound - comments? | Antenna | |||
End Effect on folded dipoles/monopoles? | Antenna |