Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 14, 2:33*pm, Owen Duffy wrote:
* *a) * * * * | * * * * * * * * * * * *b) * * * * * *| * * * * * * * | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *| * * * * * * * | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *| * * * * * * * | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *| * * * * * * * | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *| * * * * * * * | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *| * * * * * * * | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *| * * * * * * * | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *| * * * * * * * | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *| * * * * * * * -------| * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * | * * * * * * * -------| * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *||| * * * * * * * | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ||| * * * * * * * | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ||| * * * * * * * | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ||| * * * * * * * | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ||| * * * * * * * | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ||| * * * * * * * | * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * --- * * * * * * * S * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *S * * * --------------- * * * * * * * * * * * *----------------- Fig a) above is an attempt to portray a colinear vertical over infinite ground with a source at "S". The configuration is easy enough to model in NEC with sensible results. The common explanation for operation of a) is that the U shaped section is a quarter wave s/c stub, that it is responsible for delivering direct in-phase drive to the upper section, and that it plays no part itself in radiation ie, that the common mode current on the pair of conductors is zero at all points. Notwithstanding the conventional wisdom, it seems unlikely that there is no common mode current on that section, and NEC models suggest that there is, and that it accounts for some small asymmetric distortion of the pattern. Fig b) above is an attempt to represent a coaxial arrangement of tubes where the lower end of the tubes are connected together, and that is fed at S against an infinite ground. My questions a 1. To what extent is b) equivalent to a)? 2. How is b) modelled in NEC? Thanks Owen Hi Owen, I suppose that R.W.P. King disagrees with the "common explanation." He makes it quite clear that there is interaction of the antenna field with the stub perpendicular to the axis of the antenna wire, and that the coaxial stub does not interact in the same way and the antenna performance is therefore different. (Antennas chapter of Transmission Lines, Antennas and Wave Guides, King, Mimno and Wing.) This is why I like using a feedline to guarantee the phasing. It can be done by driving collinear dipoles with equal lengths of transmission line, or by using an arrangement like the "coaxial collinear," where the radiating elements are outer conductors of coaxial transmission lines used to insure that the multiple feedpoints are at least fed in-phase voltages (and you have to consider that the currents are not exactly in phase). Cheers, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vertical colinear | Antenna | |||
representation of crime in the uk media | Broadcasting | |||
"Diamond CoLinear"? | Antenna | |||
Colinear vhf/uhf from QST | Antenna | |||
vertical colinear | Antenna |