LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #30   Report Post  
Old March 26th 09, 12:08 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,169
Default colinear representation in NEC

Roy,

I have spent a lot of time exploring different modelling options over
recent weeks.

One view that one might take re my fig a) is that at connection of the
stub with the main vertical, the stub offers low impedance to common mode
current and high impedance to differential current. It leads to thinking
of it as a kind of mode trap that guides the system into in-phase
operation.

I have played around with ways of trying to represent that without using
the wire segments of the stub.

One method was to place a transformer with only one centre tapped
winding. The top and bottom of the winding connect to the upper half wave
and the lower quarter wave respectively, and the centre tap connects to a
horizontal quarter wave. My thinking was that this structure provides low
impedance to common mode current on the horizontal section, but a high
impedance to differential input to the top and bottom of the transformer
winding.

The model achieves reasonably good in-phase operation, but works best
with about 0.35 wave horizontal. I have used an NT card to insert the
transformer windings in the two segments. Here is the deck.

CM
CE
GW 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.005
GW 2 15 0 0 5 0 0 15 0.005
GW 3 15 0 0 5 7.2 0 5 0.005
GE 1
NT 1 15 2 1 0 0.01 0 -0.01 0 0.01
GN 1
EK
EX 0 1 1 1 0
TL 1 15 2 1 100 0
FR 0 0 0 0 15 0
EN

I then tried changing the horizontal section to two opposed radial wires,
and found that worked well with each radial being about 0.2 wave long.

CM
CE
GW 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 5 0.005
GW 2 15 0 0 5 0 0 15 0.005
GW 3 15 0 0 5 4 0 5 0.005
GW 4 15 0 0 5 -4 0 5 0.005
GE 1
NT 1 15 2 1 0 0.01 0 -0.01 0 0.01
GN 1
EK
EX 6 1 1 1 0
FR 0 0 0 0 15 0
EN

One can achieve similar outcome by wiring an appropriately phased zero
length TL between the segments each side of the horizontal wire.

If these models indicate that the common mode path on the horizontal wire
is important, one loses control of the length of that in the case of the
coaxial configuration because there isn't an o/c end indpendent of the
vertical conductor.

The coaxial construction gives the opportunity to create a high impedance
to differential current between the adjacent segments, but lacks the
ability to create a low impedance common mode path independently of the
vertical structure.

Thoughts?

Owen


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vertical colinear Dave VanHorn Antenna 8 October 2nd 05 11:51 PM
representation of crime in the uk media smasha Broadcasting 0 September 8th 04 08:01 PM
"Diamond CoLinear"? Airy R. Bean Antenna 7 August 9th 04 10:22 PM
Colinear vhf/uhf from QST Mogens Antenna 0 October 1st 03 02:44 PM
vertical colinear Dave VanHorn Antenna 6 September 8th 03 07:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017