Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:24:55 -0800, Jim Kelley
wrote: Calltrex wrote: Yeah the folded dipole that is. We see there 4 x ¼ = 2 lambda. Following the antennabook one can earth the middle of that folded dipole. And feed it with a coax. So from there we can bridge the mantle from the coax to the middle of the straight dipole piece. See it ? Now my problem in visualising that; the current from hot goes to the ½ wave dipole....hits ground there.....appears out of the ground(!).... hits the second ½ wave....and dives back in the coax mantle. If this is true i can't imagine it ! Now the violin string. Take one string attached between two walls or whatever. Exite it. Now ground the string in the middle.....exite the first half......and the second halve will vibrate also ?? Thru ground ?? Are the two statements right? The statement in the antenna book is probably correct. The statement 4 x 1/4 = 2 is not correct. With regard to violin strings, they only vibrate if they are mechanically stimulated. Otherwise they behave in a manner similar to other inanimate objects. :-) 73, ac6xg Well as both a ham and a better than competent violinst (I play in symphonies and also do solo recitals.) I have been playing violin for 57 years vice only 53 years as a ham, so I am a bit of a rookie on the ham side of things. You are sort of right and sort of confusing the laws of acoustics with the laws of electronics. When we bisect the violin string (which gives you an octave of the open string) the played (excited) part will give you a frequency double that of the open string. We violinists prefer to think of that as an octave. In practice, the unexcited string is damped to inaudibility. Aside from our standard tuning note of A= 440 Hz, violinists don't normally think of frequencies. In practice though violin strings don't give out pure sine waves, they have all sorts of somewhat random overtones, something which, along with the resonant box we call a violin, give each instrument its character. Without them we'd sound like a MIDI keyboard. The only time both sides of a stopped string vibrate is when we play what we call a "harmonic" and there are several of them on violin strings. A harmonic is when the violinist lightly touches the string so that the unexcited side (e.g. not the bowed side) can also vibrate and these have their own set of rules and playing implications. Fortunately the composers usually indicated this stuff for us, so we really don't have to think very much about the physics of all of this. If we lightly touch the violin string at the octave point rather than pressing all the way down as we usually do, we get something of a whistleing sound an octave higher than the normal stopped note (both sides ot the sting are vibrating.) If we touch lightly at the interval of a fourth above an open string (on an E string, this would be A above the E string, and the resultant sound is two octaves above the fundamental because you are dividing the string at a one-fourth point and are creating what in effect is a standing wave (though that concept is unknown among violinsts unless they happen to be EE's or hams.) Of course I wave length at our frequencies doesn't quite come out 300,000,000 / frequency = Lambda. We'd have some pretty damn long strings at A above middle C. I think that comes out to a wavelength of 68,181 meters. Just wouldn't fit on a violin. If you touch one note above that (B natural on the E string) the result is a not an octave and a fifth (or high B) above the fundamental frequency, because lightly stopping the B and causing it to vibrate on both side of the stop divides the string into thirds. In practice though violin strings are all over the map as to what is vibrating where and when, though if violins would produce pure sine wave instead of a rich blend of harmonics and overtones. If the FCC monitored violin harmonics, I doubt we could meet the 40 db spectral puriity requirement. Mercifully the Gov't stays out of the violin world. At a lab level, we can sort of come up with a demo of sympathetic vibrations. In practice, of course we don't. Few violinist are actually that close to in tune (close, but not exact...otherwise and orchestra would sound like a signal generator.) In string instrument history, going back to about the early 15th century, The string insturments known a viols in some cases actually did have a set of strings under the bridge which did vibrate sympathetically giving an effect somewhat similar to the wow-wow effect of a cheap organ. Most of these instruments are know played by historical music specialists and are generally out of the mainstream of the orchestral world in which I dwell, but there are a few compositions which call for the Viola d'Amore which does have such strings. (there is a short solo in the Opera "Manon" by Massenet which calls for this instrument and its sympathetically vibrating strings. Those string has some technical name, but I don't remember what they are called.) Somehow, despite knowing both RF theory pretty well and violin playing damn well, I never really ever considered the positioning of my fingers in playing as analogous to "grounding." I must work on that one. I don't think I have ever also considered my violins strings to have impedance, or reactance, and I haven't quite considered the feedline problem. Is my bow a 52 ohm feed point or 72 Ohms? :-) My bows don't have any PL-259s or BNCs on the, just horse hair. Resonance, of course is provided by the violin body, but I've never considered this in terms of RF resonance. Interesting concept. Now if we could do something like a Yagi and get sympathetic strings to provide director and reflector gain and front to back ratios, we might solves a lot of auditorium problems and not be blasted to inaudibilty by the brass instruments which of course do have rather considerable front to back ratios (though the French Horns have theirs the wrong way.) Now I have to reconcile my fiddle knowledge with all the stuff I had to learn to pass my FCC tests. I'm old enough to have passed the General and Extra tests before they were multiple choice format. The music certainly helps with the code. Jon Teske, W3JT and concert violinist. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Better than the fan dipole | Antenna | |||
80+40 MTR Dipole | Antenna | |||
80m+40m dipole | Antenna | |||
off set dipole | Antenna | |||
Help with dipole please? | Homebrew |