Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Richard,
"Richard Clark" wrote in message ... Deep space communications proceeds many dB below the noise floor enabled through technology that has become ubiquitous in cell phones - Spread Spectrum. Aka, "averaging" (for the direct-sequence style of spread spectrum, ala CDMA or GPS). Still, AFAIK all that averaging can do is to effectively lower the noise floor at the expense of bandwidth (effectively data rate), and the more benefit you'd like to get from that averaging, the more important your sample points become, which gets back to needing as little phase noise as possible on your oscillators. Is there some other angle here? ---Joel |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Noise figure calculation | Antenna | |||
Noise Figure Measurements | Homebrew | |||
WTB: HP/Agilent 346A (or B) Noise Source for HP 8970A Noise Figure Meter | Homebrew | |||
Calculating noise figure from kTo | Homebrew | |||
Claculating noise figure from kTo | Homebrew |