LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old March 24th 09, 11:08 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2007
Posts: 133
Default Noise figure paradox

Hi Richard,
"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
Deep space communications proceeds many dB below the noise floor
enabled through technology that has become ubiquitous in cell phones -
Spread Spectrum.


Aka, "averaging" (for the direct-sequence style of spread spectrum, ala CDMA
or GPS).

Still, AFAIK all that averaging can do is to effectively lower the noise floor
at the expense of bandwidth (effectively data rate), and the more benefit
you'd like to get from that averaging, the more important your sample points
become, which gets back to needing as little phase noise as possible on your
oscillators. Is there some other angle here?

---Joel


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Noise figure calculation Jason Antenna 4 February 8th 05 01:03 AM
Noise Figure Measurements Steve Kavanagh Homebrew 25 October 20th 04 04:14 AM
WTB: HP/Agilent 346A (or B) Noise Source for HP 8970A Noise Figure Meter Carl R. Stevenson Homebrew 0 January 21st 04 04:20 AM
Calculating noise figure from kTo J M Noeding Homebrew 0 September 18th 03 09:43 PM
Claculating noise figure from kTo J M Noeding Homebrew 0 September 18th 03 09:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017