Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:44:45 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
wrote: As to sampling error via the net. Time was when 16x over-sampling for RS-232 was the norm. I've meet many RS-232 routines that don't do any over-sampling at all Which is no more complex than setting 4 register bits - I wouldn't call that a "routine," however. -- I've even written a few. :-) Why more than one? Were the rest undersampling routines? Fuzzy-232? That copyrighted form of communication is an information network layer supporting Cecil's (r) "standing wave current" (c) explanation with answers that appear first, tailor-fitted to the strawman question that follows - otherwise known as the Sub-optimal Conjugated Hypothesis Information Transform (SCHIT) routine found in quantum babbelizers everywhere. Discarding random bytes improves the intelligibility and will whiten teeth. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Noise figure calculation | Antenna | |||
Noise Figure Measurements | Homebrew | |||
WTB: HP/Agilent 346A (or B) Noise Source for HP 8970A Noise Figure Meter | Homebrew | |||
Calculating noise figure from kTo | Homebrew | |||
Claculating noise figure from kTo | Homebrew |