| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 26, 9:35*am, "Joel Koltner"
wrote: Hi Jim, "Jim Lux" wrote in message ... Actually, state of the art is probably Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) codes, as far as approaching the limit. I hadn't heard of them; thanks for the link. *Can you comment on how they compare to Reed-Solomon codes? I have just enough background in error-correcting codes to spout off the right keywords in nearly-coherent Usenet posts and wait for people to point out my errors. :-) Much longer block length than typical R-S. Also, the way the check bits are generated is different. Each check bit isn't formed by combining ALL the source bits, just some of them (obviously a different "some" for each of the check bits), hence the name Low Density. Both are usually roughly rate 1/2. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Noise figure calculation | Antenna | |||
| Noise Figure Measurements | Homebrew | |||
| WTB: HP/Agilent 346A (or B) Noise Source for HP 8970A Noise Figure Meter | Homebrew | |||
| Calculating noise figure from kTo | Homebrew | |||
| Claculating noise figure from kTo | Homebrew | |||