On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 07:34:20 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:
One
inductance value (however it is wound) is not equivalent everywhere -

Nobody said one inductance value is equivalent everywhere.
Nobody is not very many people which should make this a short list.
But I don't see any names - strange.
In fact, just the opposite is true.
which must mean
Nobody said one inductance value is NOT equivalent everywhere.
or, perhaps:
EVERYBODY said one inductance value is equivalent everywhere.
or, perhaps:
EVERYBODY said one inductance value is NOT equivalent everywhere.
or, perhaps:
Nobody said one inductance value is equivalent NO where.
or, perhaps:
Nobody said NO inductance value is equivalent everywhere.
or, perhaps:
EVERBODY said NO inductance value is equivalent NO where.
....
proving your above premise to be false.
Which apparently nobody (somebody, everbody?) said.

The power of persuasion (Cecil's Degenerative form of the Sub-optimal
Hypothesis of Information Transformation) at its inventive best to be
able to wrestle two contradictory claims together and prove them both
true and false simultaneously!

Cecil must have been posed some very difficult advice as a little
nipper:
"Nobody jumped off the roof because everone did - wouldn't you?"

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC