Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:37:06 -0400, Bob Dixon wrote:
I was referring to the tuned twinlead system shown in figure 6 of the original reference http://www.bencher.com/pdfs/00361ZZV.pdf How are the lengths determined (obviously not a quarter wavelength)? Hi Bob, Obviously not? Of course it is for at least 40M (overall length); and of course it is for at least 10M (to the first notch); and half a wave for 15M and half a wave 20M. Half waves are two quarters.... Those dimensions are the intent of tuned radials. Tuned radials have some integer relationship to a quarter wave. Some commercial designs might offer radial reactance (non-quarterwave relationship) to balance out the inverse reactance seen in the vertical, but I don't think we see it here. Proximity to earth will change all of this, however. Layout a longer, overall length without cutting the notches and tune for the lowest band. Use that last 3 foot section to do this (like making it 6 feet long at first). I would then work on the first notch for 20M and cut it out long too (the 3'10" section is redundant and thus expendable) so you can shorten towards the base. Then I would work on the second notch, but cut closer to the base (say, at 18' from the base) and trim towards the end to tune in 15M. The same thing (compactness) could have as easily be arrived at by using in dependant wires, all cut to quarter/halfwave and bundled together. There is nothing particularly remarkable about the twinlead in its own right except for mechanical stability. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
10m - 40m non resonant vertical | Antenna | |||
Resonant radials | Antenna | |||
Resonant and Non-resonant Radials | Antenna | |||
Resonant frequency | Antenna | |||
RESONANT ANTENNAS | Antenna |