Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() That antenna was when I used an old parabolic satellite dish which was unsuitable. Scanning past antenna papers point to the use of a cone shape similar to a horn of 2 metres diameter produces better results. The antenna needs a longer mast so at the moment I can't compare F/R. Either way, with the radiator within the reflector envelope it is difficult to understand what creates a rearward lobe regardles of scale or frequency of use with respect to receive. At the moment I see nothing that points away from the Rutherford particle experiments with foil .ie penetration when at right angles , deflection at other angles. As usual Art you are avoiding answering the questions and choose to confuse the issues with you own preconceived ideas and terminology. The fact that the feed is totally within the "reflector envelope" tells you or us nothing about sidelobes and edge taper. I really don't think you want answers, but I'll try once mo 1. What frequency 2. What is the dish diameter 3. What is the dish focal length to diameter ratio (F/D) Dale W4OP |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dish Network "500" dish with two LNBs | Homebrew | |||
Kenwood reflector | General | |||
Vet. with a reflector | Antenna | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors |