Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 10, 9:30*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
On Apr 10, 8:45*pm, Tom Ring wrote: Art Unwin wrote: The posting is about dishes not antennas. I have not read about a dish that does not emit signals to the rear. Now I have built one and find to my surprize that it does accept signals from the rear ! All very simple, the radiator is resting at the bottom of a cone and the top of the radiator does not stick out beyond the reflector. Since you do not Well, to start with Art, a cone reflector doesn't meet the definition of a dish antenna. I'm sorry, but they just aren't the same thing. I surprizzzed you missed the difference. tom K0TAR Tom I asked the question as I am not personly knowledgable about dish style reflectors. I do read a lot and I read a paper once where it was found that a cone shaped reflector produced increased gain when used with a helix antenna, so I made one to try it out. Personaly I see it more as a horn and not as a dish with a radiator at a phase control difference from the reflector? Either way I do not understand how that I can hear signals to the rear if the reflector envelope encloses the radiator thus the question. Note that a helix radiates differently from the normal dish radiator such that phasing does not enter the design which is why you see planar dishes or "cups". Thus questions with respect to reflector diameter are not pertinentwhen the radiator is enclosed. Guys In the absence of a explanation I will provide a possible alternative. Maxwell added a specific portion to his mathematical laws that refer to mass and the speed of light thus verifying the existance of particles. This addition brought statics laws into the radiation sphere. Rutherford of the UK ( Manchester)showed that particles could piece a foil of gold because of the relative size of the particle with respect to the latice make up of the foil when viewed head on. Thus in the same way a particle or mass ejected at the speed of light from a radiator could possibly pierce a reflector when met head on. If so this would explain the rear signals. In the case of a radiator that is not enclosed by the envelope of a reflector head on deflection/ interaction is quite possible and well understood and there are designs to avoid it. With respect to dish edges one can see in the radio handbook what happens to a signal grazing a sharp edge, but that seems hard to swallow when hams cling to the idea of radio "waves" when their actions has not been satisfactorily explained with respect to radiation by physicists. I suggest that you all pick up the Gaussian equations and add the presence of a time varying field such that it is mathematically the same as one of Maxwell's laws ie look for mass and light speed signatures. We are past the times when one could suppress ideas such as the World is not flat. When you finally arrive at the point of understanding of Maxwell you only then gain an understanding of radiation. With the denial of this mathematical evidence by all you have zero understanding of radiation and therefore redundant. Bye |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dish Network "500" dish with two LNBs | Homebrew | |||
Kenwood reflector | General | |||
Vet. with a reflector | Antenna | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors |