Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: The other 10% is the traveling wave that gets radiated of course (neglecting losses). Absurd. Current does not "get radiated". It's *energy* in the traveling wave that gets radiated. Less energy indeed lowers the current amplitude. Agreed. But when discussing current, one should recognize that, with the exception of "non-flowing current" whatever that is, all currents produce a field. Field cancellation is what prevents the transfer of energy. Any of this sounding familiar to you? The standing wave pattern is useful for illustrating what the field interference pattern might look like. w7el "measured" the phase shift in current that doesn't flow. :-) He's good, but he ain't that good. Besides, his meter is the same as yours in that it only responds to waves that travel and currents that flow. The difference I suspect, is in the desired outcome and the rhetoric. I've said my piece. 73, ac6xg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dish Network "500" dish with two LNBs | Homebrew | |||
Kenwood reflector | General | |||
Vet. with a reflector | Antenna | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors |