Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Donaly wrote:
I don't have to prove you wrong, Cecil, you have to prove yourself right since you came up with this novel way of explaining antenna behavior. I have offered a proof with which I detect no technical problems and nobody has offered any valid technical argument against what I have presented. My argument is not novel and is based on sound physics as presented by the technical references I have provided. What I find difficult to understand is the sandbagging going on in defense of an old wives' tale. -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dish Network "500" dish with two LNBs | Homebrew | |||
Kenwood reflector | General | |||
Vet. with a reflector | Antenna | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors |