Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
But when there is a change in the amplitude of the standing wave in x, and I max is known, then determining the shift in phase from the equation is a no brainer, Cecil. Exactly! You and I are agreed that the *amplitude* holds the key to the phase shift *through a straight wire* so you are preaching to the choir. The phase of the total current on a standing-wave antenna is unrelated to the delay through the loading coil. Unfortunately, the current "bulge" through a loading coil causes an error in the simple "no-brainer" calculation that you are suggesting. Some other method of determining the phase-shift/delay through a coil is needed. That other method is to load the loading coil with its characteristic impedance and measure the phase shift in the resulting traveling wave. For instance, in the coil426.EZ file from my web page, the current at the bottom of the coil is 1.0168 amps at 0.00 degrees. The current at the top of the coil is 0.8179 amps at -0.06 degrees. The maximum current in the middle of the coil is 1.1092 amps at -0.04 degrees. The total current equation through a loading coil is not a simple cosine function like it is through a thin-wire. Determining the actual delay through a loading coil is apparently NOT a no brainer. -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dish Network "500" dish with two LNBs | Homebrew | |||
Kenwood reflector | General | |||
Vet. with a reflector | Antenna | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors | |||
Reflector for Hammarlund | Boatanchors |