LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old May 1st 09, 11:47 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Dish reflector

On Fri, 1 May 2009 14:44:10 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Jim & Richard,

I guess I'll retire gracefully because I'm not privy to the "history"
between individuals on this Forum and I'm now not even sure when
answers are to be taken seriously or as a joke.


Hi Steve,

You have now noted the greater contribution of comedy that inhabits
these discussions. Unfortunately, and as you indicate, those thin
jokes are rather in-bred.

Jim's most recent posting is a good example. We were talking about
measuring current along a dipole. I assumed that would mean measuring
the standing-wave current, but Jim introduced the notion of measuring
travelling wave currents.


Ah! The history you are unaware of (and it hides in the terms of
invention that populate the theories being assembled behind the
curtain) is that BOTH currents are under consideration. Unfortunately,
and you have the capacity to appreciate this, some characteristics of
one are migrating into the conversation of the other. Hence, we
return to the keyword: phase.

In one realm, phase is pointless, in the other, it has significance.
As the term phase migrates between the two, both realms' discussion
are polluted.

When challenged as to how we might do that,
we got a URL pointing us to a simple standing wave meter -


Not really. It is a simple current meter - the page literally shouts
that out.

it
certainly can't discriminate Forward and Reverse.


That is correct, but I mentioned such discrimination is possible from
the Bruene SWR bridge. As I wrote previously, no one measures forward
and reverse currents on antenna elements. Construction examples would
be rare.

With care and practice as offered at the link, which attends the
issues of error (largely dismissed from the greater consideration of
"measurement" proofs offered), the Bruene style could similarly be
achieved. It is neither a difficult concept, nor a technical hurdle.

From other postings I've read I take Jim to be a pretty knowledgeable
guy - so this has to be a wind-up, right?


Give it another thousand postings sprinkled over the decade to do
that. We have barely given up on fractal antennas.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dish Network "500" dish with two LNBs Mike Andrews Homebrew 4 February 23rd 07 08:54 PM
Kenwood reflector Kirk Mohror General 0 August 31st 04 01:01 AM
Vet. with a reflector Drbob92031 Antenna 0 November 18th 03 01:42 AM
Reflector for Hammarlund AA5JJ Boatanchors 0 October 22nd 03 04:38 AM
Reflector for Hammarlund AA5JJ Boatanchors 0 October 22nd 03 04:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017