Richard Clark wrote:
On Fri, 01 May 2009 22:37:24 GMT, "Dave" wrote:

I'll make it easy, 10 degree beamwidth and 30MHz bandwidth.

At how many GHz?

snip
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

At 160m. You can't possibly have missed that, Richard. Art has stated
it dozens of times. Maybe hundreds.

He's nuts, and very thorough about it.

tom
K0TAR

On May 1, 9:01*pm, Tom Ring wrote:
Richard Clark wrote:
On Fri, 01 May 2009 22:37:24 GMT, "Dave" wrote:

I'll make it easy, 10 degree beamwidth and 30MHz bandwidth.

At how many GHz?

snip
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

At 160m. *You can't possibly have missed that, Richard. *Art has stated
it dozens of times. *Maybe hundreds.

He's nuts, and very thorough about it.

tom
K0TAR

Tom, you are a real misery. Are you suffering from depression?
In this group some are so dense you have to state things a hundred
times at least

On Fri, 01 May 2009 21:01:26 -0500, Tom Ring
wrote:
I'll make it easy, 10 degree beamwidth and 30MHz bandwidth.

At how many GHz?

At 160m.

Art is careful to never give every detail. Experience has taught him
that doing that leads to the quick thud of deflating claims. Like
Cecil, always arguing about a detail means never having to say you're
sorry.

You can't possibly have missed that, Richard. Art has stated
it dozens of times. Maybe hundreds.

Well, perhaps 11 times or 99, I pulled the plug on him and only hear
his postings as static behind other conversation. 10 years of his
dull needle stuck in the same worn groove has lost its -um- charm.
Same thing for Cecileo's preaching from the gallows hoping that the
last fall will give him enough swing to kick someone in the nuts.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

On May 1, 10:01*pm, Tom Ring wrote:
Richard Clark wrote:
On Fri, 01 May 2009 22:37:24 GMT, "Dave" wrote:

I'll make it easy, 10 degree beamwidth and 30MHz bandwidth.

At how many GHz?

snip
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

At 160m. *You can't possibly have missed that, Richard. *Art has stated
it dozens of times. *Maybe hundreds.

He's nuts, and very thorough about it.

tom
K0TAR

Tom hes too thorough.
I think hes just a troll, maybe he,s the real Arts grandson or
something. Hes too consistent to be as blithrering as he acts. Maybe
he is just some old fart that likes to stir up conversation and gets a
kick out of how long of a thread he can create or how many hundred
words he can get someone to write.

His "antenna design" isnt origonal. I am not sure what the origonal
source was but I know at one time it was used as a joke among CBers.
They would describe it to some newbie and get him to build it and put
it up on a tower and make him jump through as many hoops as possible
to get it to work. So maybe he is just one of those from the CB
usegroup having fun with hams.

Jimmie

On May 2, 12:34*pm, JIMMIE wrote:
On May 1, 10:01*pm, Tom Ring wrote:



Richard Clark wrote:
On Fri, 01 May 2009 22:37:24 GMT, "Dave" wrote:

I'll make it easy, 10 degree beamwidth and 30MHz bandwidth.

At how many GHz?

snip
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

At 160m. *You can't possibly have missed that, Richard. *Art has stated
it dozens of times. *Maybe hundreds.

He's nuts, and very thorough about it.

tom
K0TAR

Tom hes too thorough.
I think hes just a troll, maybe he,s the real Arts grandson or
something. Hes too consistent to be as blithrering as he acts. Maybe
he is just some old fart that likes to stir up conversation and gets a
kick out of how long of a thread he can create or how many hundred
words he can get someone to write.

* His "antenna design" isnt origonal. I am not sure what the origonal
source was but I know at one time it was used as a joke among CBers.
They would describe it to some newbie and get him to build it and put
it up on a tower and make him jump through as many hoops as possible
to get it to work. So maybe he is just one of those from the CB
usegroup having fun with hams.

Jimmie

To deliberatly try to deceive one that wishes to learn is totally
dishonest.!
I try to be a gentleman at all times by trying to walk in other
peoples shoes.