| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
On May 2, 6:24*am, "Dave" wrote:
"JIMMIE" wrote in message ... On May 1, 7:37 pm, "Dave" wrote: I dont know if Dave built it or not but I did and tested the beamwidth just as you said and got 360 degrees. Rotating it had no effect at all on signal strength. I tried it on 2M and couldnt hit the local repeater with 1 watt normally I can reach it with 100mW. I would say this classifies the antenna as a dummy load. no, i am waiting for the final tweaked design. *if you have built one to art's specs then you are probably measuring just the side/back lobes, which is a very good sign. *if it has a pencil beam on 160m, then by the time it gets to 2m the beam will probably be so thin that it will be like a laser beam, so you'll have to be pointing it VERY accurately on the repeater. *so go rotate it again, very slowly and carefully, and don't forget to aim it in elevation also! Hold on. I don.t know if I have a pencil beam as I can't measure it or model it. However, I don't see that as a real hurdle! The idea that the beam width changes with frequency is beyond my ken. As for a final tweaked design, for a ham that is an impossibility |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Equilibrium and Ham examinations | Antenna | |||
| Equilibrium in free space | Antenna | |||
| Equilibrium | Antenna | |||
| Gaussian equilibrium | Antenna | |||
| balun at resonance? | Antenna | |||