Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
not long time ago i was caught by a doubt, partially solved in my mind, but i think can be interesting for the folks here reply to a antenna newbie (me) about newbie questions ![]() The doubt was (and is): a monopole, end feeded, that is 1/4 wave phisical lenght, is obviously also 1/4 wave electrical lenght, in respect of the classic "book image" that show the wave travelling (or standing, here i see different opinions...) cross the monopole just for 1/4 of the full sinewave. And this in my mind is OK. Now, how i do treat a 5/4 wave phisical lenght monopole, in respect of electrical lenght ?? It is even a "1/4 wave configuration" and 1/4 wl electrical lenght, because the sinewave travelling (or standing) in the monopole terminate in both cases at 1/4 of the wave, or 5/4 is just 5/4 wl and 1/4 is 1/4 wl, electrically and phisically ?? Note: i'm wondering about the impedance, not about radation patterns. I'm aware that radiation patterns are singular in respect of the singular electrical lenght of the monopole. Or better, that is what i learn, right or wrong ![]() The second question is about 1/4 wave vs 1/2 wave monopoles. I googled around, but no one define exactly why "1/2 wave antenna don't need ground plane". The most technical explanation i found is that due the high impedance at the feed point, the 1/2 wl antenna don't care about the ground plane. But i'm not so convicted about this, and a basic explanation of the 1/2 wl "no-ground-needed" theory is appreciated. Apologize for grammar errors and lenght of the post. Regards and 73. -.-. --.-, Cristiano, Italy. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|