| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
John KD5YI wrote:
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... John KD5YI wrote: I think any inductor with the same inductance, Q, and self-resonant frequency will give the same velocity factor and delay as your Bugcatcher. That may or may not be true - I don't have an opinion one way or another - and it is NOT part of my argument. My argument deals only with 75m Texas Bugcatcher coils and other large air- core loading coils used on 75m. If it IS true, then the point I tried to make that you are making a distributed component from a lumped one is valid. That's what caused me to object to your earlier post. And, by the way, I feel the same way you do except about people who are afraid to consider lumped components. Perhaps they do not have what it takes to judge when a proper substitution can be made. John Anyone can take a small inductor, such as Roy described, and try to analyze all the currents and such in it using a distributed model at low or moderate frequencies. If they do, though, they'll just come up with what they'd have come up with treating their small inductor as a lumped element. Cecil has distributed elements on the brain. It's what comes of falling in love with your own theories. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tom Donaly wrote:
Anyone can take a small inductor, such as Roy described, and try to analyze all the currents and such in it using a distributed model at low or moderate frequencies. If they do, though, they'll just come up with what they'd have come up with treating their small inductor as a lumped element. One wonders why some people insist on a "small toroidal inductor" which obviously agrees with the lumped-circuit model instead of analyzing a 75m Texas Bugcatcher loading coil which just as obviously violates the presuppositions of the lumped-circuit model. Instead of the "small toroidal inductor", let's discuss w8ji's 100 turn, 2" diameter, 10 inch long air-core coil through which he measured that ridiculous 3 nS delay after which w7el posted some "agreeing measurements" while asserting that the electrical length of the coil was 33 degrees. Does anyone else realize that 33 degrees in 3 nS at 4 MHz is faster than light speed? Are you guys so afraid of losing face that you are willing to post technical falsehoods? -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FA: Yaesu FT-8100R like new dual band dual recieve | Equipment | |||
| FA: HTX-204 Dual Bander! Like the ADI AT-600 | Swap | |||
| DUAL not duel. DUH! | Swap | |||
| Dual Band HT | Swap | |||
| WTB: UHF or Dual band ham rig.. | Swap | |||