LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old May 9th 09, 09:40 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2009
Posts: 19
Default Dual-Z0 Stubs

Tom,

I thought I'd quoted some numbers in the related "Dish reflector"
thread - apologies if I did not. Here are some mo

* I modelled a coil as a spiral in EZNEC (40T, diameter=6",
length=12", #14 copper wire)
* I added a 6ft "stinger" and found the frequency where the
combination was resonant: 3.79 MHz
* I checked the feedpoint impedance without the coil present: 0.46-
j2439
* That tells me the "lumped circuit equivalent" reactance of the coil
at 3.79 MHz is +j2439 ohms
* I found the frequency where the coil was resonant with no "stinger":
6.2 MHz

Now I look at what ON4AA's "Corum method" inductance calculator tells
me:

* "Lumped circuit equivalent" reactance at 3.79 MHz: +j2449
* Self-resonant frequency: 6.3 MHz

Unless I'm missing an option, if I want to predict the RF
characteristics of a "bugcatcher" it seems I have 3 choices:

* Use Wheeler's formula
* Build a helical model in EZNEC
* Use the Corum method

Wheeler's formula is inappropriate at frequencies close to a coil's
SRF.

EZNEC and the Corum method give very close results. The Corum formulas
are not difficult to use; even if they were, there is an on-line
calculator which removes the need for any maths. So it seems to me the
Corum formulas would be the more convenient tool to use, at least for
a "first look".

73,
Steve G3TXQ


On May 9, 7:06*am, "Tom Donaly" wrote:

You know, you haven't shown that the Corum model accurately measures
the bugcatcher coil. You have stated - and I have no reason to
disbelieve you - that the Corum model agrees with EZNEC. If that's the
case, it's just as easy to use EZNEC, right or wrong. MoM is a method of
obtaining numerical solutions to integral equations. The only reason to
do that is if symbolic solutions are either too difficult or impossible
to puzzle out of those same integral equations. In other words, some
very deep thinkers decided that MoM would give results superior to
algebraic approximations and hand waving, so they applied it to antenna
analysis. I don't think it's perfect. It's certainly useful. If you
think Corum is good enough for your purposes, though, go for it.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA: Yaesu FT-8100R like new dual band dual recieve Rich Equipment 0 October 21st 06 12:13 AM
FA: HTX-204 Dual Bander! Like the ADI AT-600 Jimmy Mac Swap 0 February 21st 05 12:28 AM
DUAL not duel. DUH! W2RAC Swap 10 December 8th 04 01:44 AM
Dual Band HT Curt Grady Swap 0 January 4th 04 03:40 PM
WTB: UHF or Dual band ham rig.. Rod Swap 0 September 25th 03 01:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017