"Richard Clark" wrote
...
On Tue, 19 May 2009 15:40:04 +0200, Szczepan Bia?ek
wrote:

YOU ALL make me troll.

You must suffer terribly from our imposition, but your form of cure
isn't going to answer the absolutely stupid things that you write.

Only Richard wrote that the term "polarisation" apply to an equipment. To
waves rather "polarity".

Something you still don't understand - even in direct translation.

I do my best. Posting is also a free English lessons. It is a good method
(only the long hair dictionary is better).
So do not discourage. You are doing a good job.

Too late for me for study.

Too lazy, rather, as evidenced by:

"Trolling" is more efficient.

If you had been sent out of the caves to "efficiently" discover fire,
we would have returned to living in the trees.

Laurence Hecht advices return to Ampere. Gauss, Weber. See:
http://21stcenturysciencetech.com/ar...odynamics.html
and:
http://21stcenturysciencetech.com/edit.html

What do you think about such "funny" stories?
S*