| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Kelley wrote:
Most of your ideas and concepts were of course correct, Cecil. Your ... it wasn't merely a difference over semantics. I have not changed any of my basic ideas or concepts. All I have changed is the definitions of "interference" and "reflection" that I was using. It was a trivial problem and easily fixed by changing "causes" to "corresponds to" and "reflected" to "redistributed". The only problem left is your refusal to accept my apology and lay the distant past to rest after I made all the revisions that you suggested. You absolute refusal to define any of the words you were using was part of the problem. It provided you with justification for adding, subtracting, and superposing average power at will. For your information, the use of the irradiance (power density) equation from Born and Wolf is *NOT* superposition of powers. It is, however, the proper way to add power densities when interference is present. If the forward and reflected waves are not 90 degrees out of phase, interference is present at every impedance discontinuity and energy is being redistributed in different directions. I would expect a physics major to know such or at least know where to look to alleviate his ignorance. You once said that the irradiance equation that I quoted from "Optics" by Hecht did not appear in Born and Wolf and that Hecht had been discredited or some such. I bought the Born and Wolf book and found the exact equation to which you were objecting. -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FA: Yaesu FT-8100R like new dual band dual recieve | Equipment | |||
| FA: HTX-204 Dual Bander! Like the ADI AT-600 | Swap | |||
| DUAL not duel. DUH! | Swap | |||
| Dual Band HT | Swap | |||
| WTB: UHF or Dual band ham rig.. | Swap | |||