Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
Sure sounds like interference corresponds to (rather than
causes) the redistribution of photon energy as described on
the FSU web page.

Yes it does.

Seems you have changed your mind from this earlier
assertion of yours.

There is no way to describe the mechanism for a reversal in the
direction of energy by means other than reflection.

Not at all. But drawing such a conclusion does reveal that you
apparently still have misconceptions consistent with the 4th mechanism
of reflection you introduced to us. Your vehement protestations and
testimonials about retractions and apologies notwithstanding.

Can you spell R-E-D-I-S-T-R-I-B-U-T-I-O-N?

Well if not, I'm sure my spell checker can. But you're demonstrated
that you can, and we're all very proud of you. :-)

ac6xg